Laserfiche WebLink
f;r. <br />■t <br />r.’ <br />t <br />I’ <br />I <br />Iff <br />K <br />f-- <br />HINUTBS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMTiSXON MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 1991 <br />#1691 & #1702 - CONT. <br />Chair Kelley stated that tn.usolutely should be addressed. <br />Rowlette asked abouu entrance monuments. <br />Mabusth nc-ed that the covenant may wish to restrict height of <br />monuments. <br />Bellows felt the application should be ta“ <br />Commission’s hands were tied as the applicati <br />on tt. the Council to make the deadline of the <br />meeting. <br />•t felt the <br />ed to move <br />cipal Board <br />It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend <br />approval of Application #1691 and #1702, City of Long Lake for <br />property at 130 Orono Orchard Road North, for a conditional use <br />permit for a planned residential development, an amendment to the <br />Comprehensive Plan, a variance to the lot area standards, and a <br />variance to the required 26' wetland setback, subject to <br />appropriate conditions included within the covenant and subject <br />to conditions noted on Page ‘ and 6 of the memo dated November <br />15, 1991 to the Planning Comfflis,.on from the Zoing Administrator. <br />Ayes 3, nays 2. Chair Kelley and Bellows voted nay. <br />(#2) #1703 EDWIN J. & TRACES GIBB«. <br />VACATION OF UNIMPROVED RIGH’*''0F-WAY, CLARA AVENUE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 • 8:15 h.H, <br />The Affidavit of Publica:*on and Certificate of Mailing was <br />no <br />Edwin and Tracee Gibbs were present. <br />Ralph and Ruth Knox, 1029 Loma Linda Avenue were present for the <br />application. They stated that they would like to obtain partial <br />ownership of the vacated street. <br />Mabusth stated that the Public Works Director has reviewed the <br />request for future public use and only asked that a 10' wide <br />drainage and utility easement be provided along the present <br />roadway. She indicated that the Knoxes would like to have the <br />City maintain a corridor to allow access to the southern portion <br />of their property. <br />>Caox noted the previous owner of his property had deeded a <br />easement for Clara Avenue and felt it should revert to <br />property ownership. <br />10’ <br />his <br />Mabusth pointed out tlwit the Loma Linda plat was filed in 1912 <br />and the Knoxes' written comments suggest the granting of 10 feet <br />in 1955. The City has no knowledge of any improvement in the <br />area in 1955. It will be the burden of the property owner to <br />provide title information as to the deeding of land for Clara <br />Avenue. <br />i' <br />I