My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2024 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
512
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTII Of TMI maULA« OHONO COUNCIL MtITXNO - OCTOifN 2S. l»«l <br />(•«) #1093 AL9CRT 0. HANSER. <br />1695 FOX STREE’r <br />moratorium variance <br />M«r«dith Howell and Mark Gronberg were present to represent the <br />•pplleant. <br />Moorse explained this is a request for a variance t.' the <br />subdivision moratorium to permit subdivision of this property. <br />Jabbour felt they should not allow this request because the <br />Council currently does not know the outcome of the shoreland <br />Management regulations. <br />Qronberg noted that it would only affect the setbacks from the <br />shoreline to the proposed residences. <br />Qootten felt this request should be denied and noted that Council <br />hopes to have the regulations finalized by February/March of <br />1992. She felt that this application is a prime example of why <br />the moratorium was adopted. <br />bronberg explained that they have used the strictest possible <br />S<'tbacks when determining lot configuration. <br />Jabbour noted that those setbacks have not yet been determined <br />and they are currently working on those setbacks. He noted that <br />after the Committee comes up with the final proposal, the DNR <br />th#n tpprovt th# ordinanc®. He noted that by allowing t a <br />subdivision. It may create substandard lots and would be unfair <br />to future buyers. <br />Callahan advised that the committee is currently going through <br />tha ordinance for the first tlwe and has yet to deterelne future <br />setbacks. Ha noted that the Council indicated they would review <br />requests for variances to the moratorium. but woulw. not <br />necessarily approve all requests. <br />Howell noted that their intention was not to be adversarial. She <br />noted that their subdivision application and the adoption of the <br />moratorium happened simultaneously. She had understood the <br />Counci 1*6 Intentions that those who follow the most restrictive <br />would be allowed a variance to the moratorium. She <br />hoped that the Council would deal quickly with the proposed <br />ordinance change so that the subdivision could proceed. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table <br />Application #1693 for Albert 0. Manser of 1685 Fox Street, for i <br />f>Ogyost for a variance to the subdivision moratorium. Ayes 5, <br />nays 0. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.