11-12-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r;’ r,; Zoning File #1663 October 18r 1991 Page 2 of 2 The Engineer's further recommendation is that a private road paved to at least a 24' width with a temporary paved cul-de-sac be constructed now to serve this first phase of the subdivision. Basework should be wide enough to accommodate a future 20* wide paved width, in anticipation of a future 9 lot development of this property. ■eighborhood Petition Referring to the neighborhood petition submitted at the Septenber meetings a. Per Exhibit G, septic drainfields are 60-70’ from the east lot line, and mote than 100' from neighboring wells, meeting all pertinent code standards. b. Drainage changes recommended by City Engineer will redirect all surface water runoff to eliminate existing drainage problems and concerns . c. The alleyway noted by petitioners is not a legal access of any sort. Applicant has sole discretion as to whether he wants to allow for continued use by neighbors. Xamoes to bo Koaolvod Again please review the staff memo of September 9, 1991. The following issues need to be addressed in order to make a recommendation for preliminary plat approval: 1. Should the existing house be forced to relocate its driveway to Outlot A? 2. Should the applicant be required at this time to construct a 24' paved road with 100' diameter paved cul-de-sac? Staff Please refer tc the Staff Recommendation on Pages 4 and 5 of the September 9 memo. Any recommendation for approval should include Conditions 1 - 9 as indicated in that memo. Condition 2 on Page 4 should be revised to read ”2. Standard drainage and utilities easements to be granted over entire plat, as well as drainage easesMnts over ponding areas as noted in City Engineer's letter of 10/18/91. Preliminary site grading/drainage plan per City Engineer's recommendation to be submitted by applicant foi* approval prior to preliminary plat review by Council.* Isv