Laserfiche WebLink
f V . <br />TOS Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From <br />Dmtmt <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />October 10, 1991 <br />Subjects #1683 Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road <br />Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />List of Bxhlbits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit t <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Topographical Survey <br />Future Subdivision Concept Plan <br />Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/17/91 <br />Planning Commission Minutes 9/16/91 <br />Petition frcrni Hackberry Neighbors <br />City Engineer's Letters 10/8/91, 9/12/91 <br />Septic Layout <br />Memo and Exhibiâ– s of 9/9/91 <br />Diacuaeloii <br />The applicant has submitted a concept plan for future <br />subdivision of the property, and has submitted a topographical <br />survey of the entire property. The City Engineer reviewed <br />drainage on the site on October 17 and his verbal recommendations <br />are suanBarlzed as follows (see 10/18/91 letter): <br />- creation of a drainage swale along Waterto«m Road <br />- regrading of existing drainage swale along subdivision <br />east boundary discharging to a detention pond to <br />created at the northeast end of the property <br />» upgrading of culverts and swales as necessary between <br />15S and 185 Hackberry Bill <br />- drainage easements to be provided along all lot lines, <br />and over existing pond north of house and new pond to <br />be created <br />- construction of paved road and cul-de-sac to City <br />standards <br />Zt was noted that the east boundary of the property contains <br />a nuaiber of trees which would be destroyed if the existing swale, <br />which needs to be upgraded, is kept within the standard 10' <br />periaieter drainage easement. It is staff's recommendation that <br />in order to save these trees, the easement along the east border <br />be expanded to 25', allowing the swale to be upgraded within its <br />current location. Because this is a perimeter easement, the area <br />of the easement should not be excluded from dry buildable area.