My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2024 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2024 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
512
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
miint <iwifim» <br />2285 OanMt StrMt. Box 576 <br />Long Lake. Minnesota 55356 <br />(812) 473-8864 <br />(800) 421-0434 <br />November 8, 19^1 <br />Orono City Council <br />Orono Ciy Offices <br />1335 S Brown Rd <br />Orono. MN 55323 <br />^ r <br />To Whom 1C may concern: <br />We made application on 6~23-9i for o cl.iss III subdiv ismu. At tli»* fi’st <br />planning commission meeting 2 mombers were .absent .iml the issues disrusse.l <br />ifcre road or private dri/ewav and siiould the existing Imuse be retjuiiMd <br />to connect to the outlet for access. At the public hearing on ''epteinber Ih, 1**^1 <br />#1603 Johnson,Moos, Row let t e felt that it should be tieafed .is ,i -IttNewiv <br />Instead of a roadway and that the existing drivewav be iett ,»lone. <br />The other request was tf< supply a topogr.iphical m.ip ol the etitire p.it«el <br />(19.7 acres) and show a proposed total subdivision. <br />I had the work requcJted done and submitted n time lor the m-xt meeting. <br />At the time of the meeting I Itad not yet receive*! stall's letter ,in<l additi«>n.il <br />request due to some mail delav. At the planning commi s.su'ii meeting ol September Q.l^i^l <br />it was a very different atnospher' It was 3-1 to denv until a grading plan <br />Is received and also paved d s old be required. <br />From the beginning we had taHed thr" the process «>f going to -i lot line <br />rearrangement,then lot subdivision a.s a two step process to deal with r(,e <br />road issue. It is a substantial expense t** put m a road as re<juested bv <br />the city engineer. 560' of road with cul de sat is .ipprox im.itel v $36,0(K> <br />which makes it a major inccnvenier.ee. <br />What we are requesting is that a varlence be giv«*n lor thr* roadwav vs drivew.iv <br />so that Mr. Suess does not have to go through the two step pio*ess. We <br />are willing to get a grading plan done, however, we Iee1 it sh ild be on <br />how the two lots will impact the drainage and not on the total concept ol <br />10 lots as requested by th»* city. We leel they at«* quite diffeieni in <br />how the drninage should be dcMit with. <br />Thank you for your at tent '^n to this e-^tter. <br />Sinceritly,sin^ritiy, . <br />Islet,Broker owner <br />Century 21 Haislet Associates <br />TJM/kmm <br />1" <br />If <br />f Office 'f A/KJ
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.