Laserfiche WebLink
- <br />Ai <br />yv. <br />^ 5; > <br />K'If <br />It <br />!rr <br />s- <br />> <br />toning Filo #1683 <br />NovMibor 5# 1991 <br />Pago 3 <br />Thore is no rsguirsmsnt in the subdivision code that <br />roquirss consideration of commonly owned adjacent property as <br />part of a subdivision when lot requirements are met. Under the <br />two*8tage scenario# applicant would not be asking for any <br />variance* and would appear to have the right to request a 2 lot <br />plat# providing an outlot for future developement of the adjacent <br />property. <br />With this background information# Council may wish to <br />consider granting a variance to allow constructloi. of a driveway <br />rather than a paved road. The other option is to deny the <br />variance# which would force the applicant to go through the two* <br />stage process in order to complete his subdivision as proposed. <br />•tnff tion <br />Council is asked to address each of the issues noted above# <br />and take eonceptual action to either approve# conditionally <br />approve or deny this application# directing staff to draft the <br />S|q>ropriate resolutions for your November 25 meeting. <br />Isv