11-12-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To;Planning Commission Members Prom:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Admnistratoi Date August 15p 1985 Subject:1953 Chaska K>tina, 3340 s 3350 North Shore Drive - Variances h • n ,.=.*=4- v;^riances to permit commercial open stc i Application - J%o„u„eroial and employee vehicle on prcpe- - '^ B**2 but used residentially• and led List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Applications I) 3340 II) 3350 Plat Map . List of Property Owners Lxst Site Plan Submitted - Proposed Uses Tetter From Applicant's Attorney 8/5/85 Letter of Response From Schoeneman/Ramberg Hardcover Calculations Submitted Lmple Chaska Marina Employee Acknowledgemen Staff Sketch Summary of Request: Chaska Marina has -ng-term plans ol ^p" |2yie^; Srir%°party^:^ cLska has involved, both of which are bound on « and city Council used residentially (see H.) The «a of the have insisted that separate land use appii^^^ substandard sized property two separated properties, in ... Marina employees or renters occupying SrSspLt?v“ o. the lots while employee parking and boat/-, caller stLfgl iralso taking place on the same properties.-- - - - -- - - - ^ - In general, when the property s!"th^rlsidenU uses from residential to B-2 to commercial use reguires a became legal non-confor g* ^mgrtificate of occupancy for the commercial site plan 4-ask is to review the proposed usage ofThe Planning Commission s tas cific performance standardsproperties, realizing that our code has n - - residential or for the mixed use, hence it is necessary commercial standards apply. The Marina intends to Gholld 3?tVnVh1^s bt“Il^eed^%rt!nue2 which use is primary^ which standards should apply? Finally, realize when discussing "mi.ted use” that v, are dealing with: U-leJT f -- - - - - - - - • 1 /vocidential uses within a given piece ormixed commercial/residenriax property, i.e. house and storage on same lot