My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
10-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 1:42:05 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 1:39:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■r <br />kr.- <br />* <br />r <br />5- <br />I <br />i- <br />..•V <br />^ •- <br />•f^ <br />i^. <br />MtNUTIS OF THt REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINQ - OCTOBER 14, 1991 <br />(#4) #1573 CAROL KELLY/JAMES MASSEY, <br />3020/3030 CASCO POINT ROAD _ <br />A) REQUEST FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION REGARDING PARK FEE <br />REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY <br />B) FINAL SUBDIVISION <br />Carol Kally was present for this application. <br />Moorse explained that this Is a subdivision application that has <br />bctn befora tha Council prior to this meeting. He noted that <br />there are a couple of issues that need to be resolved, the first <br />being the amount of the park dedication fee to be paid and the <br />second when that foes needs to be palo. He noted that the <br />assessor has reduced the valuation to $72,000, thereby reducing <br />the fee due to $5,760. He explained that payment of the fee is a <br />condition of final subdivision approval, duo prior to filing the <br />plat. <br />Goetten asked If the second lot could be sold without final <br />subdivision approval. <br />Jabbour noted that It could not. however the applicant could <br />defer payment of the park fee until a later date, but the <br />valuation would then be recalculated from the payment date. <br />Barrett noted that ho was Incorrect In his original finding at <br />the last meeting, and that the Council does have the option to <br />delay action on ths final plat, however, the valuation would <br />then be calculated from that extended time period. <br />Habusth explained the applicant has a six month period In which <br />to file the plat once the Council has granted final subdivision <br />approval. <br />Kelly noted that she has been trying to complete the subdivision <br />for 1 1/2 years, and It was originally filed under the old parr, <br />dedication fee ordinance which would have required a $400 <br />payment. She has since lost two potential buyers because of the <br />status of the subdivision. <br />Goetten noted the Council understands the problems with this <br />application. <br />Kelly noted that she has spent approximately $20,000 on the <br />entire subdivision and all required Improvements to the property. <br />She noted that had she been told of the additional park fees in <br />August, she would have discontinued the application and saved <br />approximately $4,200. <br />Jabbour suggested that they approve the final plat but do <br />file It for the six month allowed period of time. <br />not <br />Mabusth noted that after the six months, applicant could request <br />an extension with no additional fees.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.