Laserfiche WebLink
t- <br />Zoning File #1695 <br />October 24, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />Planning Conniasion ReconendatiOT <br />Planning Commission reviewed this multiple request at their <br />October 21 meeting and recommended as follows: <br />1.Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval <br />of a variance to the subdivision moratorium, finding <br />that the lot line rearrangement creates no new lots, <br />that the unique characteristics of the proposal are in <br />keeping with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan by <br />making an existing developed lot more conforming, that <br />the proposal is compatible with the Shoreland <br />Regulations under consideration, and that the proposal <br />is in keeping with the Planning Commission's informal <br />recommendation to the applicants during their recent <br />variance request. <br />2.Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval <br />of the lot line rearrangement as proposed and to allow <br />the extra 180 s.f. of hardcover for the proposed deck, <br />resulting in a net decrease in hardcover percentage <br />from 66.2% to 58.0% in the 250-500* zone. <br />Staff Bern—endstion <br />Staff has not drafted resolutions for any facet of this <br />request pending Council direction. <br />Council should review the four specific findings that must <br />be made in order to grant a variance to the moratorium (see memo <br />of 10/17/91). <br />If Council conceptually approves a variance to the <br />moratorium, then you may wish to consider the merits of the <br />subdivision/request for variance revision. If Council agrees <br />with the Planning Commission recommendation, a motion to grant <br />conceptual approval would be appropriate. Staff would then draft <br />the appropriate resolutions for your November 12 meeting. <br />lev