My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
10-14-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2024 9:46:31 AM
Creation date
7/16/2024 9:41:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TH 12 Policy Conunittee Meeting <br />September 18« 199t <br />Page 6 <br />then calibrated (decreased the number of trips, for example) to more closely represent <br />ground — but only in Hennepin County. In Wright County, inear regression of <br />hi!ttnrii*ai was used to compare with 1990 actual da«a. Q. Wert lorecasts also done <br />for TH 55? Response: Yes, also CR 11. <br />A1 Rettinger (Long Lake): When would condemnation start? Response: 2-3 years prior <br />to construction (19977). Q: Is an adjustment available to recoup value lost on property <br />before condemnation? Response: No mechanism in place to address this. Once a corridor <br />is mapped, RALF can be used to help willing sellers. Poss: But what about Wright County? <br />Response: There is nothing in place for WripJit Co. similar to RALF at the present time. <br />Q: Why is *hiK process being done so far ahead of design of facility? Why does it have to <br />take so long? Response: This projea is not umque; this (lengthy process) happens in all <br />projects (scoping fint, then EIS). <br />Pete Pittel (Long Lake): Why is Brown Road the main access point iuio Long Lake? Why <br />not use Willow Road as a feeder road (for interchange on S. Bypass freeway) Response: <br />The interchange was provided as one possibility - wiil probably change as alternatives are <br />narrowed ana as smdy continues. Comment: Accesses need to be provided on east and <br />west ends of a city, rather .m in the middle. Response: City does have "a say" as to where <br />interchanges would be ph: i. <br />Q: Prior planning for extension t.; 1 12 - what is the status of this? <br />Response: The current scoping process restarted the planning for TH 12. <br />Brett Alexander (Independence): Scoping will tinue. even if construction will not be <br />done again (i.e. selection oi Alternative 1, "No Bi .’.esponse: Correct. Have to decide <br />if and where facility is to go before can ge» consin*-iion funding. <br />Suzanne Pittel (Long Lake): Who is protecting the drop in property values or if realtou do <br />not disclose? Response: The law states that realtors must disclose knowledge of the projert <br />based on available data. <br />AdiournmeiU <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. <br />RDH/vw
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.