My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
09-09-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 2:27:25 PM
Creation date
7/9/2024 2:24:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1663 <br />August 30, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />The oversized accessory structure at 1,648 s.f. located on <br />Lot 2 will no longer achieve the credit of the principal <br />structure located on Lot 1. During an inspection of this site, <br />portions of the barn structure have been found to be in a serious <br />state of disrepair. The lean-to attached to the east side of the <br />original barn and the shed to the west side appear unsafe and <br />must be addressed by applicant. At the proposed 2 acre arr'-> for <br />Lot 2, the property is allowed a 1200 s.f. oversized ac cry <br />structure. Applicant has agreed to remove both the old sr <br />the west and lean-to/pole barn out asks that the remaining n <br />at 30.2' X 18.4' (55.69 s.f.) be allowed to remain for 1 year. <br />The applicantion was tabled at the July meeting because of a <br />report by the septic inspector that the existing septic system <br />serving the residence on Lot 1 showed signs of failing. Testing <br />was required for both a principal and alternate on-site septic <br />system for Lot 1. Weekman has worked with the applicant <br />suggesting certain alterations and Improvements to the existing <br />system to see if it can still be saved. The system shall be <br />monitored. If it falls, a new septic system will be installed to <br />the northeast of the existing residence. <br />The second issue of an illegal duplex use has been resolved. <br />Review Exhibits H and I, the lower level of the residence is no <br />longer being rented. This has been reconfirmed in Mr. Johnson's <br />letter. Section 10.26, Subdivision 3 (A) does not allow a duplex <br />within the rural residential zone. The lower level cannot be <br />used for bedroom use as the windows do not meet egress <br />requirements for a sleeping room. The existing improvements can <br />remain as an accessory recreation area use for the current <br />owners. Condition of approval must include a notice to the <br />public that duplex use of this structure is in violation of the <br />Code and a disclaimer that the lower level does not qualify as a <br />legal sleeping room. <br />Plaiming Comsdssloii Recommendation <br />To approve the 2 lot plat subdivision application of Mark <br />Johnson for the property located at 4465 Bayside Road finding <br />that all standards of the RR-IB zoning district and on-site <br />septic codes have been satisfied. This approval is subject to <br />the following conditions: <br />1. Upon preliminary approval of the Council, the City <br />Assessor shall be asked to determine a park fee for the <br />creation of the new lot. Payment of the park fee is <br />based on 8% of the current market value of the property <br />in an undeveloped state. Payment of park fee shall be <br />due upon the filing of the final plat.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.