Laserfiche WebLink
S5' <br />I; <br />* <br />K".P' <br />ifc'I? <br />U:iI'.-fe;•K <br />Kti- <br />:y- <br />:'■' ' <br />f-i\ <br />;y <br />&■ <br />r-wr <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - AUQ'JST 19, 1991 <br />ATTBNOANCE 7:00 P.M. <br />The Orono Planning Commission .rat on the above date with the <br />following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie Kelley <br />and Planning Commission Members Maureen Bellows, Ed Cohen, Jeff <br />Johnson, Sara Moos and Charles Schroeder. Candace Rowlette was <br />absent. The following represented City staff: Jeanne Mabusth, <br />Building & Zoning Administrator; Michael Gaffron, Assistant Planning & <br />Zoning Administrator; ana Teri Maab, City Recorder. Council <br />Representative Ed Callahan was also present. Gabriel Jabbour of the <br />City Council was present. <br />(#1) ZONING FILE #1668 CITY OF ORONO <br />OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING <br />7:00 - 7:11 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was <br />noted. <br />Mabusth explained that this is a 2-lot plat of Lot 1. Willow <br />Properties Addition and is located in the northeast quadrant of <br />Old Crystal Bay Road North and Highway 12. A previous <br />subdivision created ? 60’ wide roadway providing a future <br />connection to Willow l 've. The northern lot is the proposed <br />site for the City facilities. The southern lot will not qualify <br />for a PUD as it does not have 5 acres. Drainage in this area is <br />a major concern. All access to these properties will be provided <br />off Outlot A, with perhaps one additional curb cut a minimum of <br />ISO* north of the road outlot Intersect ion. <br />There were no public comments on this application. <br />Mabusth indicated that the designated wetlands on the site <br />is at approximately the elevation of 1019. The dry buildable <br />acreage is li.8; total lot area is 14.1 acres of which 2.28 acres <br />of It Is wet. <br />Bellows questioned the iS'- j of ownership as it relates to <br />the subdivision. <br />Mabusth noted the application has been signed by the owner. <br />Callahan Indicated that this Issue has been taken care of. <br />Bellows questioned the topic of retention on the site and <br />Indicated that It has not been addressed by the Design Committee <br />to date. She wanted to know how serious the drainage f-oblem is <br />as this may place restrictions on the building envelope. <br />i- <br />Im <br />ii" <br />1