Laserfiche WebLink
I- <br />I <br />IM <br />ft <br />V <br />J-' <br />-•i <br />I.. <br />tP <br />|r <br />1 <br />I <br />•V <br />P <br />7/ <br />£ <br />rv;. <br />f. . <br />f^.::i4 <br />t,I,. <br />tM'; <br />MINOTBS of the planning commission meeting JANUARY 17, 198S <br />ATTENDM Planning Commission met on the above date with the <br />following members present: Chairman Kelley; Planning Co^ission <br />members Johnson, Bellows, Brown, Cohen, Hanson and <br />following represented the City staff: Building and «oninq <br />Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning <br />MZini.«.tor Gaffron and City Recorder Scheffler. Council <br />Representative Edward Callahan, Jr, attended and CounciImember <br />Goetten was also present. <br />#1366 LOSBI BOTTBRFIBLD <br />3925 NRTERTOmi ROAD <br />f»TAgg II pRBLimHART SUBDIVISION <br />PUBZilC RBARIH6 7s00 P«M. “ 7:35 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. Butterfield was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator ^afiron <br />explained that Mr. Butterfield was requesting to subdivide a 5- <br />acre dry buildable lot from a 17 acre parcel. The applicant is <br />proposing to use Outlet C, which is 28’ in W3.dth, <br />the new lot. The accessory structures on Lot 1 will no longer <br />meet a 10* side setback, but will be only 1’ from the new side <br />lot line. Outlot A and Lot 2 will be subject to a special lot <br />combination, yielding a 5-acre parcel that cannot be separated. <br />ThsTDNR has indicated that they have no specific setback <br />requirements from the Luce Line Trail. <br />Chairman Kelley asked whether the lot to the south of the <br />Luce Line could ever be accessed from the south^. ”5* <br />stated that he had a right-of-way agreement with the DNR to allow <br />crossing the trail. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows asked for the combined total <br />of Outlots ^B and A? Gaffron replied that it would total <br />approx^tely 3.5 dry acres. Bellows expressed her <br />the Luce Line Trail dividing the property. Mr. <br />interiected that the Luce Line was in a deep cut at that <br />location. Planning Commissioner Hanson <br />ramifications of dividing the property in such a <br />explained that the code section allowed 5 <br />L? S SlilittS Another cod. .action addre.... the <br />issue of a lot being split by a road or road easement. Th^ <br />would bring forth the question of whether the Luce Line woul <br />considered a public road or a public road easement. <br />Bellows, Hanson and Kelley expressed their concerns and <br />reservations about the involvement of the Luce Line ^ <br />ISbdlvlsion Bellows asked whether building restrictions could <br />Sf^llced^upon tieTSts to the south of the Luce Line. Her main