Laserfiche WebLink
-!*•**/• • 9 <br />- : <br />TO;Mayor Grabek <br />Orono Council Meirbers <br />City Aiministrator Bernhardsor. <br />FROM:Michael P. Gaffror., Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:February 9, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: #1366 Loren Butterfield, 3925 Watertown Road <br />Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution <br />Zoning District - RR-IA, 5 acre <br />Application - Split off a 5 acre lot for apolicant's son to <br />construct a residence. <br />Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Planning Commission Action Notice Dated l-29~89 <br />Planning Commission Minutes Dated 1-17-89 <br />Memo 6 Exhibits of January 12, 1909 <br />Draft Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution <br />Discussion <br />Please review the Planning Commisison minutes and action <br />notice^ and the memo of January 12, 1989. Briefly, the <br />applicant is proposing to split off a 5 acre lot in order for his <br />son to construct a hom'e. The proposed 5 acre lot will contain <br />approximately 2 1/2 acres on t^ rth side of the Luce Line, and <br />2 1/2 acres on the south side. -oposed house site will be <br />on the north side. <br />At their January 17 meeting, P^ .ing Coiwnission discussed <br />depth the merits of creating a 5 acre building lot separated <br />.two parcels by the Luce Line Trail. Planning Commission <br />generally concluded that as long the building site parcel <br />contains a mxniiBum of 2 acres, and that t e property <br />configuration will allow for 100' setback from the Luce Line <br />right-of-way as well as allow for pri ^^y and alternate <br />drainfield sites, the separation is not a critical concern. The <br />Plann'^7 Coemission did place specific restrictions and <br />requirec>''mt8 for the outlets on the south side of the Luce L*ne, <br />as noted later in this memo. <br />The proposal leaves a 12 acre parcel with the Butterfield <br />Greenhouse operation. The access to the proposed new bui Jding <br />lot is to be via a 28* wide outlet along the east 7ron.*rty <br />boundary. This leaves a 1' setback from the existing greenhouse <br />structures* Planning Ccmitlsaion felt that this driveway outlet <br />location was appropriate, with the encrance revisions suggested <br />by the City Engineer, because it conlM provide for potential <br />future roadway t. serve the neighboring prop< rty to the east.