My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 10:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 10:24:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Toj <br />FroBs <br />Dates <br />*w ot s <br />Mayor Peterson and City Council <br />Citv Administrator Bernhardson <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Building & Zoning Administrar^j^ <br />V' <br />July 2, 1991 <br />Curtis H. Green, 3220 Watertown Road (Lot 2, Blk 1, <br />Senn A.^'’*tion) - Request for Single Access to New <br />Build: Site <br />% <br />% <br />❖ <br />. ition <br />-Preliminary Plat Resolution <br />-Final Plat Resolution <br />List of Achibits - <br />A - Applicant's Request <br />B - Plat of <br />C - Resoluti‘ <br />D - Rasolutlo <br />E - CMP 7-13 <br />P - Applicant.ceptual Site Plan <br />G - Staff's Sketch <br />Review of Request - <br />The Senn Addition was approved on the 13th of August, 1990. <br />At the time of final plat approval the original Crystal Creek <br />plat had been granted preliminary approval that proposed a <br />western extension road abutting the north lot line of Lot 1. it <br />was the intent of the City that this property would achieve <br />future access via the east/west road of the Crystal Creek plat. <br />In fact, the original final plat resolution included a condition <br />of approval that would have required connection to that roadway <br />at the time of its completion. The ■^p^xicant asks that <br />condition be removed because of the expense involved with the <br />installation of the proposed roadway 'n Lot 1 from Watertown <br />Road. The bridge constructon alone was a major cost factor if <br />it was to provide access for emergency vehicles. The <br />resolution (Exhibit D) merely addresses the fact that Outlot A <br />would serve for shared t -iveway purposes and ttat an easement <br />would be granted in fa'^ jr of Lot 1 over Outlot A. Review the <br />preliminary plat resolution #2700 (Exhibit c). Staff has high <br />lighted the areas that reference the shared use of the driveway <br />by both properties. The shared drive concept was understood and <br />accepted by the developer throughout the review. <br />Cook approved this location of the curb cut for the shared <br />drive at Watertown Road finding the sighting distance adequate <br />for 40 MPH zone. The requirement of a shared access is <br />consistent with the City's review procedure/policy in the <br />creation of new lots and with tiie directives of the Comprehensive <br />Plan (review Exhibit E).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.