My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 10:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 10:24:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RBSOLOTIOM GRANTIIIG <br />VARIANCES TO <br />MONICIPAL XONIMG CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND <br />SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 CF) <br />PILE *1649 <br />WHEREAS, Daryl and Elaine Peterson (hereinafter "the <br />applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1921 <br />Fagerness Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter <br />"City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 18, Fagerness, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter <br />"the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for <br />variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 <br />and Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (f) to permit the construcion <br />of a 2 car detached garage to be located 4,5' from the side lot <br />line where a 10' side setback is normally required, and <br />contributing to a hardcover percentage of 31,2% in the 75-250' <br />zone where hardcover is normally limited to 25%. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />...ono, Minnesotas <br />FINDINGS <br />1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1649. <br />2.The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family <br />La)ce8hore Residential Zoning District. <br />3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on June 17, 1991, and recommended approval of the proposed <br />variances based upon the following findings: <br />A)There is no garage currently existing on the <br />property. The property is triangular shaped, coming to <br />a point at the rear of the lot. Existing retaining <br />walls, topography, and the angle of the lot lines in <br />relation to the house, provide sufficient hardship to <br />justify granting of a side setback variance. <br />B)Granting of the side setback variance will have no <br />significant impact on neighboring properties. <br />Page 1 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.