Laserfiche WebLink
1 .* , <br />$ <br />b. <br />tK,:. <br />m <br />provide that in coniunction v; . tn the boildinj por.T.it process. <br />Citv can Jeterr:une to wha^The information is necessary :'.0 ne <br />extent the discharged treated water will iTipa-'.t tne sewer system <br />and whether to bill them for a SAC unit. She informed Council <br />that the MWCC does not lorm.ally charre a SAC unit i cases such <br />as this. <br />Mayor Peterson asked how often tne City will require the <br />applicant to submit informativin regarding the results of the <br />tests. <br />Gerhardson stated that such reports are normally submitted <br />on a quarterly basis. He added that the Metropolitan Waste <br />Control Commission charges a "Stength Charge" because the product <br />that will be put into the sewer system must be specially treated. <br />Bernhardson recommended that tie a-reement between the <br />parties could limit al^ernaxe uses of the property while the <br />temporary structure exists and tnat would serve as ano er <br />incentive to remove the strjcture. <br />Council agreed with Bernhardson's suggestion. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the <br />Commercial Site Plan, as presented by Richard Keaveny, subject to <br />Staff's preparation of an agreement that will be entered into by <br />the City of Orono and the applicant. The agreement is to <br />incorporate the recommendations as discussed by Council. All <br />voted aye. Motion passed. <br />(#8*)ZONING FILE 11643-DAVID J. NELSON <br />740 NILLON DRIVE SOUTH <br />RBNBNAL VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #2967 <br />It was ra.ived by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt <br />Resolution #2967, granting a renewal of a side setback Variance <br />to permit the construction of an attached two stall garage at 7-40 <br />Willow Drive* South. All voted aye. Motion passed. <br />(#9)HARDCOVER STATUS OF HEED CONTROL FABRICS <br />Gaffron presented Council with a variety of litG..atare <br />regarding weed ciintrol fabrics. He also distributed several <br />samples of different types of woven and non-woven weed control <br />fabrics. He stated that the non-woven fabrics have a much higher <br />permeability range >f 10 to 100 times that of woven fabrics. <br />Certain fabrics have been treated with various ciiemicais and/or <br />resins that will make them impermeable He added that the local <br />centers sell both non-woven and woven varieties. Geffron <br />suggested that it would creat? a problem, from an enforcement <br />standpoint, if Council agreed to allow the ur.e of non-woven <br />versus woven fabrics, but by doing so, it will tell the residents <br />that the City prefers non-woven over woven fabrics. <br />Jabbour indicated that he wou d like f.o find out what <br />percent of water will not pass through permeable fabric and use <br />- 8 -