Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Hr., <br />D.'> <br />*■>- <br />P <br />■I <br />r <br />fi' <br />: ; <br />r <br />1. <br />Ik <br />to tie B-4 Zoning. <br />It was moved of B-Jtler, sercr.ic:i b; Jjetten, to adopt <br />Resolution #2966, amending Resolution !»2947, which arant approval <br />of the final plat o*^ "The Marsh at Lafayette". All voted aye. <br />Motion passed. <br />(97)ZONING FILE 11641-RICHARD KEAVENY <br />3145 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN <br />Bernhardson summarized the information provided in Jeanne <br />Mabusth’s May 15, 1991 memo, which outlined historical aspect of <br />the contamination, as well a.» the p”oposed recovery program tva <br />clean it up. Bernhardson noted that the Planning Commission had <br />recommended approval of the Commercial Site Plan Rcjview. <br />Subsequent to thi* Planning Commission meeting. Staff discussed <br />the iisue further and ii recommending, should there be a motion <br />to approve, that it include language requiriig removal of the <br />temporary structure once the recovery program has been completed. <br />Jabbour asked whether it would be appropriate for the City <br />to require the posting of a bond to assure that the building is <br />removed and the site is restored. <br />Bernhardfion stated that it may bs more effective to include <br />language in the agreement stating that in the event the building <br />is not removed by a certain time, tne City will remove it and <br />assess the costs back to the property owner. <br />Butler agreed that there needs to be some mechanism in place <br />50 there is assurance that the City will not wild up paying to <br />have the building removed. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if the building will maet the required <br />.15 foot setback. <br />Nabusth stated that tlie building will meet the setback, it <br />is t.he landscaping proposed for the northeast and south side of <br />the structure that will be 30 f?et from Kelly Avenue. <br />Butler asked why such a permanent building design is bei.ng <br />used, as opposed to bringing in a mobile unit of some sort. <br />Mabusth stated that the permanent aspect of the structure is <br />necessary because of the pumping equipment it will house. <br />Butler asked Mabusth for the dimensions of the building. <br />Mabusth replied, "The building will be 10* x 23'. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if the applicant has provided the daily <br />flow of treated wate." discharged into sanitary sewer. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicant will be requir«fd to <br />« 7 -