Laserfiche WebLink
iV' <br />V <br />)■' <br />Zoning File #1642 <br />May 15, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />The westerly site (prirr.ary) contains a I5» slope and is <br />8uitable for a trench drainfield. The Orono Septic Code requires <br />that for slopes of 12“18%f soil conditions must be carefully <br />evaluated to ensure that no horizontal layering of soils will <br />lead to side hill seepage. The applicant's site evaluator has <br />performed a number of borings to depths of 6-8', and is <br />recommending that while there is little likelihood of side hill <br />seepage due to layering, there is some groundwater uphi 1 1 from <br />the system that should be intercepted by a curtain drain. The <br />drainfield proposal meets all required setbacks from lot lines. <br />The other unique feature of this system is the need to pump over <br />a distance of approximately 220', requiring a slightly larger <br />than norma 1 pump. <br />The alternate site, requiring a mound, is near the front of <br />the lot and uphill from the house. With a slope of 10% and <br />Average perc rate 15 minutes per inch or faster, this site meets <br />criteria Orono has historically used for mound systems. The <br />design submitted meets all setback and design criteria per the <br />State of Minnesota Sewage Treatment Systems Standards, Chapter <br />7080. <br />Orono's Code has always been somewhat ambiguous regarding <br />the maximum allowable slope for mounds, and staff has in the past <br />tried to limit mounds to slopes of no more than 6-8% wherever <br />possible. State Code would allow mounds on slopes of 12% or even <br />steeper if the area of the mound is increased. <br />Staff has taken the position that where slopes exceed 6%, <br />mound systems have a potential for affecting or being affected <br />by structures or barriers immediately downslope. We therefore <br />attempt to increase the separation between the downhill toe of <br />the mound and any structures or driveways, to more than the <br />minimum 20’ required setback. This extra setback allows more <br />undisturbed area at the toe of the mound for expansion of the <br />absorption area and reducing the potential for compaction or <br />barriers to affect the mound. <br />For the above reasons, it is staff's recommendation that a <br />10' side setback variance for the Swanson residence be allowed, <br />leaving a 35' alternate drainfield setback from the house rather <br />than 25' if no variance is granted. <br />Setback Variance Effect on Neighborhood <br />The other issue to discuss regarding uhe house setback <br />variance, is the orientation of the house, the functional front <br />and rear yards of the house, and whether the 10' variance will <br />have a significant effect on neighboring properties. In a small <br />lot situation, i.e. quarter acre lots, often the orientation of <br />houses on corner lots leaves one resident's busy backyard