05-28-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

n7o l-iV. r,MCI) Board of Directors April 24, 1991 Rascop moved. Bjorlin seconded, to reconsider the approval of the 1991 multiple dock licenses and to remove the -/.celsxor Park Tavern from the list. Grathwol asked for defeat of tlie motion. The procedure proposed allows for an orderly handling of the license and allows room for negotiation with the Excelsior Park Tavern. The motion failed on a show of hands. Grathwol moved. Babcock seconded, to approve a $U'h deposit refund to Harrison Harbor Twin Homes Associates. Motion carried unanimously. , , . *lGrathwol was excused at the conclusion of the Water Structures Committee report. Advisory Committee, Chair Rascop Foster and Bjorlin were excused during the discussions. „ ,1. Long Term Management Program Exchanges with Cities following a. b. Proposed amendments to Shoreland portion of Underlying Principles Proposed amendments to Shoreland Grant Agreement James Uttley, Metropolitan Council. facilitator for the Management Plan. reported on the modifications made in the Shoreland portion of the Underlying Principles of the Management Plan following the 4/17/91 meeting at Mound. A copy showing the modifications was distributed along with a re*draft of the ShorelanI Grant Agreement. Uttley reported a compromise was reached at the meeting with six cities at Mound April 17 to remove Appendix 'C” from the Plan and place it in the working papers, as a model ordinance, available for the cities to use.^^ Babcock expressed his opinion that by removing Appendix ‘*C‘* the Board is in disagreement with its approval of the Management Plan. His concern is that seven cities have signed the Shoreland Grant Agreement including Appendix "C", and they should be included in the decision to remove it. LeFevere responded that removing "C“ from the Management Plan does not change the Shoreland Grant contract with those cities which have approved it. It will be necessary to amend the Plan if this change in the underlying principles statement is made, along with other references to Appendix “C" in the text. Uttley went on to say this is a statement of LMCD Management Plan philosophy. Another change is tb-;. the Technical Committee will perform a technical review. Upon completion of the technical review the city shoreland Ordinance drafts will go back out to all the cities. It is then that the adjacent cities can take formal action. Even if the cities do not have veto power over an adjacent city's ordinance, they can proceed to request further hearings beyond DNR to make their case. 8