Laserfiche WebLink
* <br />/l-rrP(^n<eruT- I- <br />TO: <br />PROM: <br />DATE: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^^^ ^ <br />April 15, 1991 <br />SUBJECT: City Communications <br />Attachment: A. City Communications Memo Dated 4/27/91 <br />B. Draft Communications Plan/Annual Cycle <br />ISSUE - Determine the means by which Council desires <br />communicate with the public as to: <br />A. Types of communications <br />B. Frequency of those communications <br />C. Cost invested <br />INTRODUCTION -* At the Council’s April 4, 1991 Council meeting <br />Attachment A was presented. Council, given the lateness of the <br />evening tabled this item until the April z2, 1991 Council <br />meeting. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Issue #1 - Types of Formats: <br />1. Workshops <br />2. Town Meetings <br />3. Newsletters <br />4. From the Council articles <br />5. Preliminary agendas <br />6. "Tonka Report" <br />7. Cable casting <br />8. Information Brochure <br />9 . Other <br />Issue 12 “ Freguency/Topics ~ Attachment B outlines the matrix <br />for a ^tential coramun i cat ions plan during the next year using <br />the various media. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that after Council discusses <br />it, give direction on which means of current communication they <br />desire to continue and which new ones they would desire to <br />implement. Further specifics will be brought back to the <br />Council's May 13, 1991 Council meeting. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by the Council after <br />giving direction to staff tables further consideration until May <br />13, 1991. Ayes _, nays _. <br />cc: Department Heads