My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
05-13-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2024 12:33:06 PM
Creation date
6/11/2024 12:28:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />K* i <br />i' <br />k’'. <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1991 <br />(|17)LMCD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTINUED <br />change at t’lis time ar. to how wo proceed or. the s.iorelan^ <br />regulations, we can either proceed jointly with ■: .e LMCD, or with <br />DNR in this umbrella organization, we can try to get a separate <br />grant, or just proceed separately and not obtain a grant." <br />Jabbour stated that he had <br />meeting. He indicat*td that .le <br />JoEllen Hurr put forth on Orono's <br />in his opinion, Orono is quite a <br />lakeshore communities, and that it <br />to wait for those communities to <br />a‘.tended the April ITt i LMCD <br />w.as pleased with the efforts <br />behalf. He also stated that, <br />few steps ahead of some other <br />would be detrimental for Orono <br />catch up. He said, ’I also <br />that Orono is going t.** have to d«ial w. th tne DMR in <br />respect to t.he remaining cities. The City will have to expend <br />an enormous aiiount of money and effort out of o‘ir budget, in <br />light )f the new Technical Advisory Committee, so they can sit <br />down and gat all the cities up to speed." <br />Callahan commented that the discussion ihat is taking place <br />among the 14 cities regarding the shoreland regulations is a pure <br />waste of everyone’s time. He said, "However, the other cities do <br />not seem to realize that. T;»ey might as well stop talking about <br />the LMCD and start talking to the DNR. When they get around to <br />that, they tan make all their objections to the DHR. I have <br />3^i*^ovis reservations about joining the Technical Committee, <br />though we do not need tn decide that a?: this moment. I also <br />agr«e that we ought to get our view of the shorelaiid regulations <br />decided upon and proceed. I believe that CounciImember Jabbour <br />agrees with that." <br />Jabbour did agree and said, "We would end up having a sample <br />Ordinance, showing what we think should be done." <br />t:allahan said, "The DNR i=» hoping that the Technical <br />Committee will be formed and will have veto power c .er what the <br />other cities are doing. However, that hts nnt y.vt b=en <br />determined. In other words, if Spring Park did not an-ae with <br />something we were doing in our shoreland management, ..len tuey <br />would have veto power over that, and so on around the lake. It <br />is difficult for ro«? to think of the time wasted by getting <br />involved in a struggle with any other lakeshore community over <br />their ordinances. I nave severe reservations about the plan that <br />they are adopting, let alone the legal consequences of the plan, <br />which they think it has." <br />Callahan suggested that the draft of principles be finalized <br />(correcting spelling errors, as noted by Councilmembe.r Goetten), <br />and then sant tn the 14 cities with a letter stating that it <br />represents Orono*s ideas. <br />- 22 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.