My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
05-13-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2024 12:33:06 PM
Creation date
6/11/2024 12:28:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />■i <br />r <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1991 <br />(II5)STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED <br />presented. He said, "I would ii.<e to see toe committee put <br />together some option that wou ,d constitute a general consensus <br />and then present that package to the residents, aid see i: we <br />can’t meet half way." <br />Callahan stated that f-'e cost an important fictor, but <br />before that is determined, it ,\s necessary to determine what <br />areas will be included in the pro3ect. <br />Jerry Rcwlet-he asktid l£ the Sta-.e his establ ishfd any <br />specific time frame by which lakeshore properties m.st b- <br />sewered. <br />Goetten stated that the ^ity’s Comprehensive Plan cites <br />Stubbs Bay as the last lakeshore area to be sewered, but does not <br />set forth a time frame. <br />Lee Barren, 175 Landmark Drive, stated that he supports the <br />sewer project and believes that sewer should be installed, but <br />the City should e.namine what properties are to be included and <br />which are to be excluded. He sa.d, "I was in the same position <br />as the Ziesroers, except that I decided in March, l')89, to have a <br />mound system put in, because I wa.*? told thar I d .d not have any <br />alternative. I am within the area iet forth in the Comprehensive <br />Plan as needing sewer, but my property does not need sewer. I am <br />aaying that sewer is a good idea, but those of U3 with two-plus <br />acre lots aid new existing mound systems need alternatives and <br />some flexibility." <br />Jabbour suggested that those people that have already been <br />actively involved with this project would make ideal members for <br />the citizens committee. <br />John Bjrger asked for the opportunity to comment. H?* said, <br />"In the Stat* Legislature, where I spent considerable time in <br />recent years, there is an anti-Lake Minnetonka attitude. I am <br />afraid that if we do not exercise our judgment and do the things <br />that need to be done, that someone else will be telling us what <br />to do. The attitude is that nothing .i.s too expensive for people <br />that live on Lake Minnetonka, or too unfair, as long as Lake <br />Minnetonka people pay for it. I cannot document this, but I can <br />tell you ^’lat there will be actions taken, because Lake <br />Minnetonka becoming a more State-wide resource. If we who live <br />out here want to have anything to say about it all, we had better <br />start talking. I urge the Council and Staff to do whatever is <br />necessary to gat this sewer project done. Wo all know that it <br />needs to be done, and that things are not going to get any less <br />expensive. I am willing to holp and will d«> anything that I <br />can. <br />Mayor Peterson suggested having Dsve Peterson and John <br />- 20 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.