Laserfiche WebLink
Eir <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 3, 1991 <br />(#13)HIGHWAY 12 POSITION Cr <br />Commission's recommenda^ Highway 12 Corridor i i-S <br />entirety, including the- pai.^ pertaining to the consideration <br />of merging the Cities of Oroi. ■ -d Long L^ke together sometime in <br />the future. That is the Cit/'s new, adopted position. Goetten <br />asked how the letter that was sent tvi the City of Long Lake, <br />3tati!ig that paragraph had been deleted from the recommendation <br />adopted by the City, would be handled. B:-rnhardson stated that a <br />letter to the City of Lonj T.ake would oe drafted and <br />would'state that the March 29th letter incorrectly stated that <br />the last paragraph had been deleted. Jabbour said that may not <br />be a true statement because some people understood the motion one <br />way, and others thought it was something else. He suggested that <br />it would be more appropriate to indicate in the letter tnat in an <br />effort to re-clarify their position. Council took the issue on <br />again and reached the follov/ing position. All CounciImembers <br />agre*»d that they understood the motion before them includes the <br />merger comment. Motion, Ayes-3, Goetten, Peterson, Nay. Motion <br />passed. <br />As indicated in their discussion of this item. Councilmember <br />Goetten and Mayor Peterson preferred to have the City's position <br />on the Highway 12 Corridor nt'Jt include statements regarding a <br />consolidation *of the City of Orono and the City of Long Lake. <br />Peterson and Goetten wished to maintain good\/ixl between <br />the two Cities, aod felt that the City of Long ^a.-ie may be <br />sensitive to such language and not view it in a favorable light. <br />Goetten and Mayor Peterson agreed with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation, with the exception of the last paragraph. <br />Councilmember Callahan suggested that the letter to MNDOT <br />either refer to t’ne enclosure aa a resume' of the City's <br />pQjition, >r it shou.d actually include t.ie entire Planning <br />Commission recommendation. <br />(#14)SANDY BEACH SHIMMING BEACH <br />In response to directions from Council during their review <br />of this item at their March 25. 1991 meeting, Bernhardson <br />reported that it would cost the Ci-y s 3,900 t.n $5,400 t"> post a <br />lifeguard eight hours a day, seven days a week ac Sandy Beach. <br />Butler asked if the City had funds available to do so. <br />Gerhardson replied, "No, this is not a budgeted item." <br />(t was moved by Callahan, seconded b/ Mayor Peterson, to <br />adopt tho Planning Commission's recommendation to have the beach <br />remain open to the public, that no dock will be installed in <br />1991, that the current closing hour of 8:hg o.m. be continued, <br />and that Police patrol be increased. All ;ed a/e. Metion <br />passed. <br />- 20 -