Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Zoning File #1637 <br />April 19, 1991 <br />Page 5 <br />Issue of Legal Combination <br />Please review Exfvibit L and M. In the early 190O's wnen the <br />major expansion was completed for the conference center, the City <br />failed to ask for the legal combination of the properties <br />Involved with the improvements. Note that parking and signage <br />are located on Parcel 2. Per Section 10.29^ Subdivision 1# <br />signage and parking are classified as accessory uses. Such uses <br />a principal use or structure on that specific parcel. <br />The church has requested signage that would be located on Parcel <br />2. If the City was to grant a building permit for such signage, <br />a variance would be necessary. In fact, based on the new uses <br />proposed for the facility, if legal combination was not to be <br />required of applicant for at least Parcels 2 and 3 (as referenced <br />in Key Map), the applicant will be required to file variances for <br />parking and signage to support both church and ^ <br />uses. Please review Mr. Mitchell's letter. Exhibit N, in which <br />he explains difficulties of legal combination for applicants. The <br />City Attorney is in contact with Mr. Mitchell to advise him of <br />the zoning dilemna. Suesan Pace-Shapiro has advised staff to <br />draft the resolution approving the conditional use permit for the <br />church including the legal combination at a ^ <br />and 3. On Friday, April 19th, Mr. Mitchell advised that he would <br />direct his clients to legally combine the two parcels that <br />contain all improvements. <br />Mr. Mitchell will draft a letter to be signed by owners <br />reaffirming all conditions of the City in the use of the facility <br />while under the ownership of the Spring Hill Land Company. <br />Isv