My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
04-22-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2024 11:33:42 AM
Creation date
6/10/2024 11:26:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
761
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I-¥: <br />ii- <br />Zoning Pile «1636 <br />April 17, 1991 <br />Page € <br />Additional Coic nta and Planning Coaau.ssion Reconauendation <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the original 1985 lot area <br />and width variance granted the subject property and the property <br />to the immediate north. Members also noted the 35% hardcover <br />variance granted the year after to the northern lot. Hardcover <br />in a recent review involving the northern property showed <br />hardcover at a 40+%. Members felt the landscape area to be <br />minuscule in relation to overall hardcover (115,5 s.f. or .8%) <br />and that driveway in its present configuration was needed to <br />provide safe access from the site. The Planning Commission <br />recommended against any further removal of existing hardcover <br />improvements and approved hardcover at the current 37.4%. <br />The lakeside deck and street side deck were approved as <br />constructed. Members found both decks not overly ambitious but <br />wanted to create a special notice in a final resolution advising <br />a future owner that no further encroachment of the lakeshore yard <br />will be approved. <br />In consideration of the street side deck. Resolution #1817-8 <br />did discuss that the extension of a foundation wall would not be <br />allowed. The street side deck did not require the extension of <br />the foundation wall. Members approved the side setback variance <br />and noted the original 20' setback between structures was <br />satisfied (condition of 1985 variance). <br />There was additional discussion regarding the existing <br />access ::tair/deck structure. Future owner should be advised of <br />the ursafe condition and that existing structure would not be <br />allowed to be improved and that new access stair must meet <br />current standards of the City. <br />Of the options set forth above, the applicant chose to <br />approve the variance application as proposed. The enclosed <br />resolution has been draft per the findings and conditions noted <br />above. <br />Isv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.