My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
11-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:54:11 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:47:58 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 26, 1998 <br />(^2430 Paul Phillips, Continued) <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to send Application ^2430, 2140 Sixth Avenue <br />North, back to the Planning Commission for their review. VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*(/^13) #2431 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE <br />RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4185 <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2431 815 Partenwood Road <br />and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4185. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#14) #2432 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 4755/4775 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />EASEMENT/SUBDIVISION <br />Laurie Lundeen, Greenfield Corporation, and Jim DeBerg, were present. <br />Van Zomeren stated the Applicants are requesting a revision or amendment to the final plat <br />resolution to accommodate a private driveway easement over Lot 3 to provide access to <br />Lot 1. The private driveway easement does not comply with the approval resolution for the <br />final plat, which shows an outlot for all three lots along Bayside Road. Van Zomeren stated <br />Staff is generally not in favor of private driveway easements due to the possible problems that <br />may result. <br />The Planning Commission recommended denial of a private easement and suggested that the <br />Applicant apply for a lot line rearrangement, which would require a lot width variance for <br />Lot 3. <br />Jim DeBerg, 1551 Hunter Lane, Medina, stated he had previously met with the property <br />owner and offered the private driveway easement not realizing that it was in conflict with <br />what was originally approved in the Resolution. DeBerg stated he was later informed by the <br />building official that he could not have a private driveway easement. <br />Laurie Lundeen stated they were unaware they could not grant a private driveway easement <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the City does not officially recognize a private driveway easement. <br />DeBerg remarked that even with the granting of the private drivew ay easement, the lot still <br />exceeds the minimum lot size. <br />Van Zomeren stated a lot width variance would be needed in the case of a lot line <br />rearrangement for the middle lot
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.