My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r ^ <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 17, 1997 <br />(#2 - #2212 Sidney and Barbara Rebers - Continued) <br />Berg asked the size of Outlet F and its intended use. Rebers said the property was 6.6 <br />acres. When questioned whether he would focus on a use that would generate low tr^c, <br />Rebers said he envisions an additional perimeter buffer to save trees and impose a budding <br />setback larger than the 30' setback allowed. His intent is not to maximize the use of the <br />land. <br />Stoddard was informed of the number of U-tum areas along Hwy 12. <br />The Plaiming Commission discussed the number of options relating to right-in, right^ut <br />access, U-tums, access from Brown Road, and triggers for future development. Gaffron <br />inquired if the development of Outlot E should be the trigger as noted m the conditions of <br />Sugar Woods or if the Commission was satisfied with Outlot F being the trigger. <br />Stoddard moved, McMiUan seconded, to approve Application #2212 with approval for a <br />right-in. right-out curb cut subject to applicant being required to pay for any future road <br />or bike trail on the north side of said lot. Lot 1 would be subject to utility and dramage <br />easements continuing along Outlot D and subject to any future development between <br />Willow Drive and Brown Road along the Hwy 12 corridor. The applicant would be <br />bound by the City’s requirements for road access. The right-'m, right-out access would be <br />eliminated when the frontage road is built. <br />McMillan questioned whether the motion was too restrictive and if the option of ali^ng <br />with BrimhaU could be reviewed to allow for total crossing of Hwy 12, which would <br />benefit safety. Stoddard did not recommend amendmg the motion but said applicant could <br />discuss the possibiUty with Mn/DOT. Pflam said the applicant was negotiating with <br />Mn/DOT regarding the pond and could consider the Brimhall option. Cliff Otten said he <br />would offer his support of the Brimhall option. <br />Smith inquired if a shared curb cut c: ild occur with a bank and the Wear property. <br />Gaffron said Wear would haw, to be consulted, and there were possible safety concerns. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#3) 7:45 P.M. - #2224 CITY OF ORONO, 2080/2160/2190 WAYZATA BLVD. <br />REZONING - 8:58-9:00 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.