My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
09-28-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:41:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:30:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. <br />6. <br />A. The City Council approved after-the-fact variances to allow an accessory <br />structure on the lot, with the condition that future proposals for additional <br />accessory structures on the property may result in the requirement to <br />remove the existing shed. <br />B. The oullot was created for the purposes of holding a gray water septic <br />system to serve the three adjacent properties, although sanitary sewer has <br />been provided and the septic system is no longer necessary. <br />C. The outlet is jointly owned by the adjacent property owners located at <br />3424, 3444 and 3464 Eastlake Street. <br />D. All property owners support the applicant's proposal. <br />E. The size of the accessory structure shall not exceed 140 s.f. <br />The proposed location of the accessory' structure has sufficient screening <br />to reduce the visual impact from Bayside Road. <br />F. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.