My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
05-11-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:58:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 27,1998 <br />(#12) #2362 BOB HOWARD, 1300 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. <br />4072 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Howard were present. <br />Van Zomeren explained that the property is approximately .4 acres in the RR-IB zoning district. <br />Several vari?r.ces are required to rebuild a residence including lot area, lot v/idth, front yard, side <br />yard and rear yard setbacks. She referred to the sur\'ey showing the encroachments. A topographic <br />map shows ther^ 'j'e wetlands that encroach the property in the northeast corner requiring a 26' <br />setback for structures. She also had sketches of the proposed residence. The Planning Commission <br />voted in favor of granting all requested variances. Properties with fire damage are allowed 6 months <br />to remove the debris. After variances are granted, a year is allowed to apply for the building permit. <br />Since no accessor)' structures are allowed when there is no principal structure, the accessory <br />structure will be required to be removed. <br />Goetten asked who would monitor the setback when a new accessory stmcture built. Van Zomeren <br />replied that a building permit would be required, and the structure would have to meet hardcover, <br />structural coverage and setback requirements or a variance would be required. <br />The applicants had no additional comments. <br />Jabbour questioned the use of a 1985 survey. Van Zomeren explained that a final grading plan <br />would be required with the building permit. The application was allowed to move forward because <br />insurance companies do not pay for application fees, surveys, architect fees, etc. The 6-month time <br />limit and vandalism on the property are immediate issues. <br />Jabbour asked that all debris on the property be removed, not just the fire damage. Since this is a <br />substandard lot, a limited amount of activity is allowed. <br />Goetten reiterated that all of the property needs to be cleaned up because some of the debris is not <br />a result of the fire. Van Zomeren confirmed that all debris would be removed, based on discussions <br />with the Building staff <br />Jabbour asked if the applicant understood the conditions being required. Howard asked if it all had <br />to do with the variance. Jabbour responded that the City wants to take this opportunity to be sure <br />there is an appropriate residence and improve the property. <br />Van Zomeren added that she had volunteered to work with Mr. Howard's insurance company. The <br />cleanup must be complete within 6 months from the December date of the fire. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.