My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
05-11-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:58:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 27,1998 <br />.1 <br />(#10) #2359 HESTIA HOMES, INC. ON BEHALF OF MATT & KAREN PARKS, 825 <br />FOREST ARMS LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4070 <br />The applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren explained the application was for an average lakeshore setback. The applicant has <br />provided topographic infomiation which shows how the grade changes from the shoreline to the <br />house. Originally staff thought there was a bluff. Planning Commission had concerns that it may <br />not be a bluff Staff reviewed the information again and determined that it is technically a steep <br />slope and not a bluff Because the Planning Commission did not want to grant a bluff setback, they <br />requested that the applicant reduce the size of the deck. Since the bluff issue is no longer a <br />consideration, staff would suggest allowing the deck as originally requested. The average lakeshore <br />setback is still an issue. Van Zomeren noted the resolution had been drafted for an average lakeshore <br />setback with no reference to a bluff impact setback. <br />The applicant had no additional comments. <br />Goetien commented that the resolution did not state the size of the deck. Van Zomeren explained <br />that the deck was before the Planning Commission because of the bluff impact issue. However, it <br />also requires a \ ariance for the average lakeshore setback. She agreed to add the size of the deck at <br />526 s.f. to the resolution. <br />Peterson asked if there would be a double fee charged because of the after-the-fact garage. Van <br />Zomeren responded that there would not be because it was not the applicant's problem. The deck <br />has not been constructed. She explained that the building permit for the garage was processed while <br />the Building Official was out of the office for medical reasons. When the Building Official reviewed <br />the plans, he discovered there had been some miscommunication about the review process and a <br />variance was required. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4070 granting approval of Application <br />#2359 for an average lakeshore setback variance, with the inclusion of the size of the deck in the <br />resolution, for the property located at 825 Forest Arms l ane. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#*11) #2360 ANTHONY KMETZ, 640 ORCHARD PARK ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 40? 1 <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4071 granting a variance to permit <br />construction of a three stall garage addition to be located 71.7' from the front lot line where a 100' <br />seiuack is required for the property located at 640 Orchard Park Road. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.