My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />(#1 1 - #2341 Daniel J. Anderson - Continued) <br />Daniel Anderson indicated to the Council that if the property is walked, they would note <br />that the land teepees up to where the existing residence is located. He said he reviewed <br />the topography with the Watershed District and asked for their opinion. From the <br />preliminary discussions, Anderson felt it would be somewhat of no use to have a pond. <br />He noted that the foliage by the lakeshore catches runoft'from entering the lake. <br />Jabbour asked Anderson how he has addressed street runoff Anderson said a concrete <br />gutter will border the road with catch basins. The water will then run under Old Crystal <br />Bay Road to the swamp. Jabbour said the intent of the City is not to divert water across <br />Old Crystal Bay Road but keep runoff on the property. Gaffron noted that the City has <br />the authority to require stormwater ponding. Jabbour reiterated his disfavor with cash <br />contributions to the Watershed. Anderson said his plans were made from feedback <br />received from his engineers. <br />All Council members agreed on the need for stormwater management on the property. <br />Jabbour informed Anderson that he will need to develop stormwater management plans. <br />Goetten inquired of the lot sizes. Anderson said the lots are a minimum of 2 acres, some <br />are larger. Goetten asked for clarification on what the property included. <br />Jabbour noted that misinformation was given to Mr. Dayton regarding neighbors who are <br />landlocked and want dock privileges. Jabbour said these properties can have two boats <br />but be licensed to anyone. He would like Mr. Dayton to be informed of this information. <br />The substantial vegetation of the lagoon was noted. It was emphasized that this <br />vegetation cannot be harvested <br />Gaffron responded that while the LMCD may feel one way about docks, City code says <br />that dock space cannot be provided to anyone but the occupant of the property except in <br />the B2 zoning. Gaffron said he would argue that the City has in place through the code <br />the right to limit dockage. <br />Anderson asked if a dock can be part of a homeowners association Gaflfon said that <br />w ould require a joint use license, w hich does not allow dockage for lots that do not abut <br />the lake <br />Kelley asked if an association dock can be done through a PRD. Gaffron said under the <br />Shoreland Ordinance, the amount of shoreline would determine the docks The shoreline <br />amount w ould be divided by 200' to determine w hat number of docks would be allowed. <br />He noted that this has only been done at Landmark Drive
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.