My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
02-23-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:18:02 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:10:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
527
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application, the reports of the City <br />staff, the comments of the Planning Commission, and of the comments and written statements <br />submitted by the applicant. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota, hereby denies the conditional use permit application as described above based on one <br />or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property and application: <br />FINDINGS <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />This property is located in the LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District <br />and consist of 22,420 s.f or .51 acres where a minimum of (1/2) one-half acre is <br />required. <br />The subject property received multiple variances on March 10, 1997, for average <br />lakeshore setback, hardcover in the 75-250' and 250'-500' setback and structural <br />coverage as set forth in Resolution #3851 . <br />The subject lot does not meet the minimum lot width requirements for the LR-IC <br />Zoning District. The minimum lot width requirement is 100' measured at the 30* <br />street yard setback. The subject property lot width at the 30' setback is <br />approximately 57'. <br />The Planning Commission voted to deny the application as proposed on the <br />following findings: <br />A. There are alternative design options for locating the garage and driveway that <br />do not require a conditional use permit. <br />B.The commission has heard testimony from adjacent property owners and the <br />neighborhood regarding adverse impact. <br />In review of the factual findings noted above, the Council finds that granting a <br />conditional use permit to allow grading within 5' of the property line is not in <br />accordance with the objective of the zoning code and the Comprehensive Municipal <br />Plan. <br />Page 2 of 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.