My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
04-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2024 11:26:02 AM
Creation date
6/4/2024 11:21:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
558
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
If. <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1991 <br />li?)NAVARRE HEIGHTS DRAINAGE CONTINUED ' <br />“"’"coTstated that Staff had mat wtth the paople on T.90 Roaa <br />aid determin-?d that there a problem ;that area. He said, <br />"It is our belief that the problem on Togo Road is independent o <br />the Livingston Avenue problem and should be addressed separately. <br />The City will provide some ditching and minor repair work in that <br />Thriroperty owner in that area with the worst proolem has <br />indii'ated that^he would be willing to do some grading on his lot. <br />ie informed him that we would stake the property to give him some <br />guidelines. I do not think there is need to complicate the <br />Liiingston Avenue problems by adding the Togo Road problems. <br />LivingstirAvenuf co?l°/be^ldr«sed%y°o^^^^^^^ ani/ordft'chin,, <br />and landscaping. <br />Cook replied, "Yes it could be. The swa.e would go across <br />the Cuffs’ Lot 17." <br />Butler asked if there is some way to engineer a ^wale so <br />that it would provide a dry buildable area on the lot, without <br />causing severe Losion. Sne added, "I would think that everyone <br />would happy with the project ir the only cost was ^ <br />landscaping contractor to re-contour Lot 1/ to accommodate the <br />Lainage. Of course, the drainage can only be accommodated <br />insofar as it does not affect the properties downstream. <br />I would be more concerned about the City s potential ^ ^ <br />for the pcoperties downstream. If the City does anything, it <br />should be done correctly, or not at a.'l.” <br />that are experiencing water problems. <br />Butler asked if a 4,'5ths vote would be necessary to get the <br />project started. <br />project. <br />Butler asked what are the project cost estimates and by how <br />many properties would that sum be divided. <br />cook replied, "The project cost estimate is $32,500." <br />- 6 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.