Laserfiche WebLink
vC> <br />t <br />K <br />discussion* it was indicated that there was a need to define the <br />'status of the plan within its bounds and that despite what <br />''reafesehtation certain LV.CD members had made about it, that it <br />^ was not just a plan that could be amended at will based on: <br />A. Metro Council staff memo which indicated they had <br />jurisdiction and could suspend all or parts of the plan <br />that they felt were not appropriate. <br />B. Even if that was not the case, the "stonewall" <br />responses many of the 8 cities objections <br />going back even a year to a year and a half indicated <br />that there may not much hope to get the plan amended <br />once it is adopted. In many cases the response from <br />LMCD was not one of attempting to work out the situation <br />by LMCD but rather told why the individual cities <br />positions were wrong. <br />As indicated the next step would be a meeting which is <br />tentatively secheduled for April 10, 1991 of all 14 cities and <br />that preparation for that CounciImember Callahan has indicated a <br />willingness to revise the prepos philosophy in line with <br />discussions from the March 27th meeting together with putting <br />together a goals and objectives outline, which would be used as a <br />basis for further redraft of the plan. <br />While the 8 cities were meeting, LMCD was holding their regular <br />monthly meeting. At that meeting the LMCD adopted Attachment D <br />as a preamble/conceptual philosophy for the plan revision. <br />Additionally they conceptually agreed to a revision of the <br />shoreland regulation agreement. (This draft language will be <br />submitted separately.) <br />Issue #2 - Attachment C is a draft for possible position paper <br />relateff^to surface use. It is the intent that the City, in order <br />to â– market other cities" as to its viewpoint on the issues of <br />surface use would present to those cities a position paper. The <br />intent of the position paper is to propose an alternative <br />approach to that one presented in the LMCD's Comprehensive Plan. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Issu <br />.. Accept the information as presented. <br />2. Ask any questions. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />4. Determine if LMCD list of principles <br />appropriate basis for discussion. <br />is an <br />Issue #2 - Position Paper/Surface Use <br />1. Adopt as presented. <br />2. Amend and adopt. <br />3. Table for further consideration.