Laserfiche WebLink
■ ^ . <br />Adopted City of Orono/Righway 12 Position Page 2 <br />The Orono City Council reviewed the Planning Commission <br />25***T5Jl ”iDeeting”^ adopted the following position at their March <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />C. <br />CITY •: I CIL OP <»OMO/RlCBWhT 12 POSITION <br />AOOPTID MhltCB 25, 1991 <br />goals a..d policies of the 1980 Community Management <br />P*ao a^s still appropriate and should be restated for these discussions. <br />The designation and/or new installation and/or upgrading of <br />a corridor through the City will not result in the rexonlng <br />to coBMrclal or industrial of abutting lands nor the <br />expansion of existing commercial or industrial zones. No <br />An curr#i)^ xonlnQ shall bs consldsrede <br />The City shall support the views of its residents but final <br />4 ^*1[?^**^^®*** ^ based on a comprehensive response toimnedlate and future transportation needs. <br />The upgrade of Highway 12 is necessary within the Orono/Long <br />Lake area because of safety factors. <br />To encourage all levels of communication between the <br />Councils, Planning Commissions and citizens' groups of the <br />Long Lake and Orono. To encourage a forum for the <br />exchange of ideas and concerns for the purpose of developing <br />a mutual plan/agreement between both cities. <br />A) effectively and safely handle traffic (not via a <br />freeway)I <br />establish corridor to plan around; <br />minimise time length for property owners caused bv <br />uncertainty as to highway location; <br />develop corridor as close to present as possible; <br />limit residential impacts; <br />protect the natural environment. <br />B) <br />C) <br />D) <br />B)