My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
04-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2024 11:26:02 AM
Creation date
6/4/2024 11:21:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
558
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r ' <br />rf <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1991 <br />smroad. V/e did not co;:ie to any conclusions, but did compare the <br />future road to existing Highway 7. as it extend^s from^xcelsior <br />through Minnetonka. Another example might be th^. Old Highw=iy 12 <br />in Wayzata that runs by Perkins. The Planning Commission agreed <br />on the term "minimum width right-of-w-iy roadway . It was our <br />opinion that no matter -hat design is decided upon, <br />should be construct«jd with.-.n the least amount of right o*. way <br />that is allowed b'' MNDOT standards. The Planning commission <br />preferred to have ' posted speeds at 40 or 45 <br />rather than 55. The Planning Commission would also like to see <br />stoplights with right and left turn lanes. We strongly encourage <br />the^Council to consider the findings of the modeling and traffic <br />counts in order to determine how much of an upgraae is needed. <br />It is always possible to torture the fscts and circumstances to <br />mLt your needs. The Planning Commission felt tnat the City <br />ought to be certain that the facts are facts, and not wnat <br />someone wants us to conclude from the numbers that we get. I <br />believe that will be one of the most difficult tasks tnat we <br />have. Especially when we extrapolate those numbers out into the <br />future. As I have nantioned before, the City <br />extrapolate the population of Orono :.n 1970 and did not do a very <br />good job. <br />The Planning Commission also discussed Highway ^5. ihe <br />recommendation does not include anything about Highway 55, but it <br />was discussed. We talked about the possibility of diverting some <br />of the east/west traffic that is now on Highway :2 to Highway h5. <br />we considered an option involving a cut-off on Highway 12 3ust <br />outside Delano that wou .d connect to Highw.=;y 55. ^ <br />Dossibility, and from my personal point of view, is something we <br />should look into. I think we need to consider how we can use <br />Highway 55 and Highway 12 to suit the needs of our Community and <br />those west of us." <br />Kelley read tiie section of the memo entitled "Impact on <br />Existing Zoning". He then explained the Planning Commission s <br />oosition regarding the impact an upgrade of the existing <br />corridor wou.'.d have on the City of Long Lake. He said. The <br />Planning Commission had a good discussion on this issue. I think <br />the Planning Commission triad to vie*» Orono and Long Lake as one <br />community because the corridor will affect us all. VJe believe <br />that future consolidation of the two cities makes gooa planning <br />sense for both communities, although we do not know when it might <br />happen. We brought this up as an issue because the Council is <br />looking to us as a Planning Commission trying to address future <br />issues. The minority opinion on this issue v/.as that such a <br />recommendation could be construed by Long Lake citizens as an <br />- 24 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.