My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
03-25-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2024 11:46:27 AM
Creation date
5/31/2024 11:41:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SPECIAL PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING <br />REGARDING HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR SELECTION <br />HELD FEBRUARY 20, 1991 <br />ROLL CALL: <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above bate with the <br />following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie <br />Kelley and Planning Commission Members Jeffrey Johnson, Maureen <br />Bellows, Ed Cohen, Jim Hanson, Candace Rowlette and Sara Moos. <br />The following represented the City Staff: Building and Zoning <br />Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Scheffler. <br />Councilmembers Goetten and Jabbour were also present. <br />Chairman Kelley opene>^ the meeting at 7:00 p.m. and welcomed <br />those in attendance. He informed tne punlic that another meeting <br />on this issue is scheduled for Feoruacy 27, 1991 at 5:30 p.m. He <br />said, "The meeting will oe mainly a work session. The Planning <br />Commission will use all of the information presented this evening <br />and try to form a recommendation to forward to the City Council. <br />In ray opinion, that recommendation should include a location and <br />a statement regarding the degree of upgrade that should occur.” <br />Kelley briefly reviewed the procedure for adaressing the <br />Planning Commission and began taking public comments. <br />Hartmut Ginnow, 1840 Lakeview Terrace, asked whether light <br />rail transit is a possibility. <br />Cohen replied, "The cost of the light rail system is cost <br />prohibitive. If such a system is implemented, it would be from <br />the Burnsville area to 35W. I also believe that because of the <br />enormous cost to construct 394 , the State will not consider <br />spending additional monies in this area for light rail transit." <br />Hanson added, "I read an article stating that the cost cf <br />light rail is not economically feasible because of the relatively <br />low population density in this area.' <br />Ginnow asked if consideration had been given to elevating or <br />tunneling portions of Highway 12 as a method of relieving traffic <br />congestion. <br />Kelley stated that the issue of design has not yet been <br />discussed. <br />John Merideth, 3685 Watertown Road, stated that he sees two <br />problems that MNDOT is trying to address with this project and <br />that there are two possible solutions. He said, "MNDOT believes <br />there is a need for a major east/west highway to extend all the <br />way to South Dakota. There are plans to improve Highway 12 all <br />the way to South Dakota. From the Communities standpoint, I <br />believe it would be best if such a highway did not go through <br />- 1 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.