Laserfiche WebLink
a to dllow zoz p-„3nr4xri5 • <br />b. Mo authority to deciia ir* the case or v3--a.*^es. <br />The intent of the veering was soeciiioally to <br />as-'-*•* “^e Planning Coiansissron ro do longer -_^nge <br />together ? h .'V^IrTd l^e' siLltlii Comniision’3 <br />"*%® ®?'f®*Tie al-a'“n‘t‘tenVr'of -.he meeting indicated that the authority. T..e ap^a.-n. t. proposed in <br />Ini^lfght rand'felt it was‘being proposed as a means to take <br />awav the little responsioili-/ t..at ^n-y na <br />c-.-c - V e s icn - A oouole of issues .oenrionGa ... Pftngrs Su^G..^>5^^n Commission <br />this area inelccao t.ta ,.c of the^ai*- that the oresenrauion a^ one ^ <br />Steliaikacv subdieision a??li=? = i°n <br />Whether John Shardlow was an ac^vccc-. --^,'7-/!-; i,, <br />or 3^ was aaddled by threat or <br />IV. <br />whole process <br />annexation. <br />sesoonse - A review or the <br />soodivision <br />and the fi-aw - A the develooer the nignt or <br />although he --"sriaT-aJ.-o of the initial retoningthe Planning Commission cons----^ -- Council room were <br />subdivision because ‘ ;^3^;on as would City staff, <br />occupied. Be ^Shard^’ow at the time that it happened <br />r„5^”if"Vx/e%ifd'=i^t ”to\TvV\een an issue of short term <br />duration. <br />. a "s'banning Commission reviewed <br />ttroi^rtSi <br />ii/^/April 1p^^o1e?r/on ^fr th^'^i^de^ll <br />their desire to annex all ta p p ig^tec to the City of Long <br />Highway 12. This was 5®^*^®f^^f_i,-cil’s review of the amendment <br />Mk. Of June -ST, f”r submiasion to Metro <br />process and prior to their fina tu-ge letters were presented <br />council. This was very ooup!e of the Planning <br />Swiss’on ~abers wire present as representatives. <br />V. /-.w.—-toablons - Ih this area conuaents included.- <br />- The general conmant that there was a breakdown in <br />coonunica tion. <br />"tJs verses Them" <br />A feeling of: A lack Vrono but <br />SSre* w■%hi”s%^^n?''t\*at- is the CouVoi's planningthe*‘point "what __ <br />5 ‘/S^