Laserfiche WebLink
C-iaprahensive Pl^r. prccass <br />C A fee ling A *• ^ ^.4 A W <<• •* W Planning Cnanission had been <br />c; ‘thTrthV actual process for Pebers was a <br />'* Combination ^ <br />allowed in Racers' case ou- --- .^n---- a.-------- <br />provision is available for non-resiaentia_ <br />de ve lopiaen t. <br />(Left anaddressed may have been soma issuas related to <br />Lhe prooosed amendment for planned developments whicn <br />were^not soecifically addressed by any or tne ?-anning <br />Commission members/ cut may cave oeen a -,-e- -- <br />them.) <br />The a’ohwav 12 orocess was ccmmenced under a diiferanp Planning <br />. * j 1 i T Q35 at*’^moted to cet incut wrom <br />«*av ias ovirtse draft dccuaent was actually crscarac cy star <br />Tact the consultant) for presentation ^ <br />area bv area^as to what they wanted on eacn of the proper-les. <br />The'-e is no comment regarding the quality of tne drarr during tne <br />ra^ilw in any of the minutes or in the recollection on stacr^. <br />The review of ti'e Planni.ng Commission recommendations togecne- <br />with those of the Council and what was subortted to^ ‘5® = <br />Council Indicate only one change fron the f <br />Comnission recommendation. This change entailed the noctheas- <br />oS«t« of the prooerty between Willow/Old Crystal 3ay and <br />ligh«y 12 and County Road Six. The Planning Commission had <br />celommended that it not be sewered and tne Council cased on <br />additional infotniation concarning the niargina- soi-^/ <br />*.hat area to be included within the MCSA line, however, retaini.ng <br />It at a two acre density. <br />exceotion documented, the recommendations given by <br />piannSrcSSSils?:ri«e Identical to those ®J«fually approved <br />bv the Metro Council and adopted by tae ^ity. I- musw be <br />remembered that the planning document is a corapcenensi P <br />«m«n<4niant and as such is drafted to meet the requirements of t^e <br />Metro Council based on issues they pos^^lons and <br />addition there were areas wnere - t ity for <br />?re"??v/an7Vhe"Se%rio^^^^^^^^th^ lime If development." The intent of the Comprehensive Plan .s <br />not to eliminate all the issues related to <br />into account the major issues for which the Met.o v-ounciJ. <br />concerned. <br />III. glanniac Commission Rolas and ~ <br />Planning Commission spokesperson ina-wawed t^o spec-,-- <br />areas of concern: