Laserfiche WebLink
I,m <br />21191.4 <br />» I • / t \ I <br />Jm\p/^€vr i) <br />- L'-J y <br />*Groiq> of 8 <br />Subject: LMCD Comprehensive Plan and DRN Shoreland Regulation <br />To the Mayors <br />As you are aware , the LMCD has requested a 90 day <br />extension from February 4th to attempt to work out modifications <br />of its proposals which will be acceptable to the cities. <br />Orono realizes that the major concerns of our city may <br />differ in emphasis from those of certain other cities. But as a <br />prelude to further discussions with one another» we attach a copy <br />of a letter from us to the LMCD. <br />We note with some concern, but little surprise, that <br />contrary to the stated opinion of the LMCD, the Metropolitan <br />Council asserts the right to veto all or any portions of the LMCD <br />plan. This assertion means that, also contrary to the LMCD view, <br />the Metro Council believes that it can veto any suggested future <br />changes or prevent future deviations. Therefore, every effort <br />must be made by us all to prevent any LMCD plan or proposal from <br />being presented which is not positively favored by at least the <br />vast majority of cities. <br />To accomplish this goal and obtain the modification we <br />seekf Orono suggests, m did the Metropolitan Council, that it is <br />essential that the representative of each city on the LMCD board <br />act under the control of, and in accordance with the wishes of, <br />the respective city councils. As a practical matter, unless the <br />cities agree to any LMCD plan, and the representatives follow <br />instructions, the vote of the representatives is meaningless. <br />Witness the current situation. <br />In a related matter, you no doubt had forwarded to you a <br />recent letter from John Stine of the DNR dated February 5, 1991, <br />relating to shoreland regulations and funding. We again suggest <br />that it is basically undersirable to negotiate with the LMCD <br />concerning DNR shoreland regulations. Therefore we encourage you <br />apply directly to the DNR for your share of the funds DNR has <br />allocated for your use through LMCD in dealing with its <br />proposals. If successful you can then leave the proposed <br />agreement unsigned, or to rescind your agreement if already made. <br />Our joint efforts to obtain modifications to the current <br />proposed plan seem to have had some success. Orono hopes we can <br />all build on that result. We trust, therefore, you will accept <br />this letter as presenting our own suggestions and views and not <br />as an attempt to exert pressure on your internal affairs. <br />Sincerely,