My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-25-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2024 10:16:38 AM
Creation date
5/21/2024 10:13:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />f<s>- <br />fij <br />f.-lā <br />p <br />OROKO COUNCIL HEETING HELD FEBRUARv n, 1991 <br />STORM WATER MANAGEMENT - CONCEPT REVIEW <br />Bernnardson presented Council with information regarding the <br />conceot of storm water management. He requested CouncLu. to <br />review the information and provide further direction to Staff. <br />It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to <br />table this item until the Mc.rch 11, 1991, Council meeting. <br />Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR SELECTION <br />Mayor Peterson anked Staff to clarify what the Planning <br />Commission's recommendation is expected to be. She asked, "Will <br />they be recommending a specific corridor?ā <br />Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission would probably <br />provide Council with a recommendation indicating where, in their <br />opinion, is the best art?a for a corridor. <br />It was the consensus of Council that there is no need to <br />delay the Planning Commission's recommendation until the traffic <br />forecast is received. <br />Goetten stated that she was disappointed in the number of <br />Planning Commission members that attended the February 6, 1991 <br />meeting. <br />Mayor Peterson concurred and asked Staff to convey the <br />Council's disappointment and concern about t:.e attendance of <br />Planning Commissioners at the Highway 12 meetings. She directed <br />Staff to contact tho Planning Commission members unable to attend <br />the work session and to advise them that Council considers the <br />Highway 12 matter of great importance and seeks the direction of <br />the Planning Commission. Council also added that they were <br />concerned that members failed to advise Staff prior to the <br />meeting of their absence. <br />Mabusth stated that she will convey to the Planning <br />Commission members not in attendan.te at the last meeting of <br />Council's concern and of the need to advise Staff prior to a <br />meeting of their inability to attend. <br />Bernhardson said, "If it is Council's wish, the Planning <br />Commission recommendation could be presented for your <br />consideration at the March 11. 1991. The information presented <br />would include goals and objectives, as well as a preferred <br />corridor location. Council may want to just accept the <br />information at that meeting and wait for the traffic forecast <br />before discussing this issue publicly." <br />Callahan stated that it would not be beneficial if the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation stated that there should be <br />no Highway 12 project at all. <br />- 22 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.