My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-25-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2024 10:16:38 AM
Creation date
5/21/2024 10:13:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ir- <br />h. <br />> V <br />V- <br />constraints; <br />G. recreational use of the surface water; <br />H. road and service center accessibility; <br />I. socioeconomic development needs and plans as they <br />involve water and related land resources; <br />J, the land requirements of industry which, by its <br />nature, requires location in shoreland areas; and <br />K. the necessity to preserve and restore certain <br />areas having significant historical or ecological value. <br />Subp. 2. Designation of zoning districts. Local <br />governments with adopted land use zoning districts in effect on <br />the date of adoption of parts 6120.2500 to 6120.3900 may <br />continue to use the districts until revisions are proposed. <br />When amendments to zoning districts on lakes are considered, <br />local governments, at least for all the shoreland wichin the <br />community of the public water involved and preferably for all <br />shoreland areas within the community, must revise existing <br />zoning district and use provisions to make them substantially <br />compatible with the framework in subpart 4. On a river, zoning <br />districts and use provisions for all shoreland on both sides <br />within the same class in the community must be revised to make <br />them substantially compatible with the framework in subpart 5. <br />If the same r’ver class is contiguous for more than a five-mile <br />segment, onl^ vhe shoreland for a distance of 2.5 miles up and <br />down stream or to the class boundary, if closer, need be <br />evaluated. When an interpretation question arises about whether <br />a specific land use fits within a category in subpart 4 or 5, <br />the question must be resolved through procedures in local <br />government official controls and state statutes. <br />Subp. 3. Land use district descriptions. Land use <br />district descriptions are as follows: <br />A. A special protection district is intended to be <br />used for two basic purposes. The first purpose is to limit and <br />properly manage development in areas that are generally <br />unsuitable for development or uses due to flooding, erosion, <br />limiting soil conditions, steep slopes, or other major physical <br />constraints. A second purpose is to manage and preserve areas <br />with special historical, natural, or biological characteristics. <br />B. A residential district is primarily intended to <br />allow low to medium density seasonal and year-rour.d residential <br />uses on lands suitable for such uses. It is also intended to <br />prevent establishment of various commercial, industrial, and <br />other uses in these areas that cause conflicts or problems for <br />residential uses* Some nonresidential uses with minimal impacts <br />on residential uses are allowed if properly managed under <br />A-1.14 <br />ilM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.