My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 11:12:41 AM
Creation date
5/20/2024 11:07:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. <br />Zoning File #1600 <br />February S, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />I'-*-* <br />20»086 s.f./150 = 133.9 or 134 stalls <br />Existing stalls * 114 <br />npsed » 108 (loss of 6 stalls) <br />irfrtSnce » 26 stalls <br />The applicant proposes a 75' addition along the west side of <br />the existing structure. The major portion of the addition <br />(47*xl20’' consists of an expanded sales and storage area. The <br />remaining portion of the addition (28'xl2') is a receiving dock <br />and a retaining wall at 17' high that runs parallel to the west <br />lot line. The receiving dock addition and wall will be located <br />10' from the Kelly Avenue west lot line. <br />The addition will also result in the loss of 6 parking <br />stalls. Members iray remember that at the time of the upgrading <br />of 15 and 19 within Navarre, the applicants lost additional <br />parking with the taking of additional lands for right-of-way <br />purposes. <br />The scorm sewer issue and vacation of the northern portions <br />of Kelly A'»enue were discussed but not formally addressed by the <br />Planning Commission. Staff's concensus with concurrence by the <br />Planning Commission was that a storm sewer project would not be <br />appropriate at this time and would be feasible at the time of a <br />Navarre Comprehensive Redevelopment Proposal for this area. <br />Please review the Planning Commission minutes of January 22nd and <br />Exhibit C for comments regarding the proposed vacation of Kelly <br />Avenue. Once aga. n, the vacation of Kelly Avenue may best be <br />addressed at the -.ime of a redevelopment of this area. At <br />present, both affected property owners wo. ,d not agree to the <br />vacation. <br />At the final review of the application in January, staff <br />asked both the Planning Commission and the applicant to consider <br />the issue of relocating accesses to the site. The purpose was <br />to minimize the hazards created with the close proximity of the <br />Shoreline Drive access to the intersection of 15 and 19, and <br />recoounended moving it to Kelly Avenue and closing off access <br />along the north property line. The applicant advised that they <br />had addressed the safety concern of the intersection o. the <br />County Roads by moving t’le current access 20' further west. The <br />problem with moving the access further west is that it is now <br />dangerously close to the intersection of Kelly Avenue and <br />Shoreline Drive. As for the relocation of the access along 19, <br />the existing elevations may prohibit truck use if a curb cut was <br />to be shared with the bank property. The applicant is concerned <br />that dalivary trucks could not make the turn given the variation <br />in grades from the existing curb cut at the bank to the level of <br />the parking lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.