My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 11:12:41 AM
Creation date
5/20/2024 11:07:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />k <br />approved by the city engineer. Instead, she went to t.he public <br />works director, John R. Gerhardson, who reviewed the site in person <br />and provided to Ms. Bellows a letter dated November 26, 199 0 (a <br />copy of which is enclosed). <br />As you can see, it appears that the public works director <br />determined that additional falling or raising of the existing <br />driveway at Lot 2 would not be practical because of limitations and <br />space. This letter does not, however, constitute a resolution of <br />the city council of Orono which would allow for two separate <br />driveway accesses to County Road 14 6 for Lots 1 <br />contemplated by both Ms. Bellows and John Morrison. <br />and 2 <br />Would you please consider assisting Ms. Bellows in obtaining <br />another City of Orono resolution further amending Resolution ^1985 <br />which eliminates the first three sentences of section 1, page 2, of <br />Resolution #2877? It would then be clear that the owner of Lot 1 <br />will be entitled to receive a separate driveway access to County <br />Road #146 so long as the owner of Lot 2 maintains all shrubs at <br />three feet height or less within an area located between the <br />traveled road and the utility pole, and the future owner and <br />developer of Lot 1 obtains an access permit from t.he Hennepin <br />Department of Transportation prior to application for a building <br />permit for new residential construction on Lot 1. Unfortunately, <br />I do not believe Ms. Bellows understands the legal necessity to <br />receive such a resolution in order to ensure that the owners of Lot <br />1 and Lot 2 will, in fact, be able to receive a separate driveway <br />access to each lot. It is my opinion that as things stand now, Ms. <br />Bellows has not complied with Resolution #2877 making it impossible <br />to get a permit for a separate driveway for Lot 1. <br />In addition, I would like to be kept advised as to any progress you <br />make in obtaining from the City of Orono an additional amendment to <br />Resolution #1985 clarifying this matter. Thank you for your <br />cooperation. <br />If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to <br />call me. <br />Very t.-uly yours. <br />Gary D.^Pihlstrom <br />General Counsel <br />GOP/wls <br />Enclosures <br />xc*Maureen Bellows <br />John Morrison <br />Jan eraser
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.