Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1605 <br />November 15» 1990 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Construction of a second story above the east half of the <br />existing house may be justified merely on the basis that the <br />house exists in the 0-75' zone* However^ construction of a <br />second story deck above the existing deck and above the east end <br />of the house will likely tend to increase the visual encroachment <br />into the 0-75’ zone, whereas the existing low deck is lass <br />obtrusive. <br />Approval of the pool as shown in the 0-75' zone would <br />require that the Planning Commission find unique hardships <br />precluding any other options. Approval of that pool without such <br />findings would be precedent-setting. <br />The encroachment past the average lakeshore setback line by <br />any of the improvements, will have little significant effect on <br />lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. The view <br />orientation of both neighboring properties is away from <br />applicants' residence. <br />Regarding the history of this property, there were a number <br />of cabins on the property prior to construction of this residence <br />in 1974. A variance was granted on May 13 , 1974 to allow a 40' <br />lakeshore setback based on location of neighboring residences. A <br />copy of the original application and Council minutes is attached. <br />Staff Reconaendation - <br />In order to make a recommendation for approval of the <br />proposed variances. Planning Commission will have to find <br />sufficient hardship and justification to support the request. If <br />portions of the project can be recommended for approval. Planning <br />Commission should establish the magnitude of any hardcover <br />increases allowed and should clearly define the reasons for <br />denial or approval of the various facets of the request.