Laserfiche WebLink
■■i: :■ <br />>: <br />; ■ - <br />pr:^k: <br />. ■ 'i <br />h- ' V- <br />^■7''r ^ •' <br />I <br />I7'-: <br />-dh' <br />W- <br />B <br />hj. , <br />i "i - <br />f’7- <br />■ ^ ;.' <br />iii <br />Ha'fceir Structure and Environment Committee January 12, 1991 <br />operate as they ai*e presently 2j Change the Code tnat either or <br />both comply with the provisions of the Code. 3) Establish an <br />administrative process for reviewing a license conversion of use <br />status on a case by case basis. '’'■•is is the process provided in <br />the proposed amendment. The prr. . >ed ordinance gives ttie LMCD <br />the opportunity to evaluate eacn applicant and stipulate <br />conditions if necessary. <br />Babcock moved, Boswinkel seconded, to recommend adoption of <br />An Ordinance Relating to Conversion of Use of Non-Confoi-ming <br />Docks and Structures in Lake Minnetonka; Amending LMCD Code <br />Section 2.11, as it provides a documented procedure which allows <br />the Executive Director to start a review process. <br />Foster said he believes the matter deserves more tiiought and <br />moved to table. There was no second and the motion failed. <br />OS ter andThe original motion carried. Slocum. Reese. <br />Bartos voting nay. <br />Foster moved. Cochran seconded, to a.sk tlie Cliair iir^iLliwoi <br />Vice Chair Babcoc.; and the attorney to suggest a resolution o£ <br />the problem with Excelsior Bay Associates and i.,hapiii3T\ Rlace. <br />Motion carried, Boswinkel voting nay. <br />LeFevere was excused. <br />6. Wetlands Progress Report. <br />Thibault presented a progress report on the wetland study. <br />A preliminary inventory was complied from the cities' wetland <br />maps, National Wetland Inventory maps and Ceologic.jl Survey maps <br />and aerial photos taken by the MN DNR in July, 199U. <br />It was noted that wetlands connected to the Lake by canals <br />had not been included. The Committee agreed these areas .should <br />be added in as part of the inventory. <br />In reviewing a sampling of aerial photos passed among the <br />Committee members, questions were raised, namely - How should <br />docks be built in wetland? should docks be .allowed on <br />residential zoned property when there is no permanent structure <br />or residence on the property? - .,.4. <br />Grathwol appointed Babcock as Chair of a sub-coinmittee to <br />continue the wetland study. Members were asked to review <br />Thibault*3 report and advise if there are any unlisted wetlands. <br />It was noted that wetland areas on Lost Lake, St. Alban’s Bay and <br />St. Louis Bay were not included. <br />7. City ot Deephaven ~ Request Regarding Mooring of <br />on Buoys <br />I’ower Boats <br />Foster explained that a three year program agreed to by the <br />City of Deephaven to convert their buoy field from a mix of <br />sailboats and power boats to sailboat.? only ended in 19^9. riie <br />LMCD allowed an exemption for 19yu to allow power boats at buoys <br />for that season. The City requests permission to continue to have <br />I mix of boats on the buoys, removing the restrictioti <- i power <br />boats altogether.-continued <br />i <br />■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .