01-28-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.1 y .f'*- T.H. 12 Corridor Study Technical Committee Minutes Delano City Hall November 13,1990 (Approved December 18, 1990) Members Present: S. Hay, J. Sweeney, A. Brlxius, J. Dillman, D. Dudinsky, W. Fingalson Alternates Present: P. Nesenson, J.D. Goetten, T. Johnson Others Present: L. Dallam, R. Harris, G. Welter, R. Scheuer, L. Clem, J. Martineau, J, Hanson, S. Nelson, D. Poss, J. Bergsten, D. Weigenant, A. Cosgrove L. Dallam called the meeting to order at 1:15 p.m. The minutes of the October 16th Technical Committee meeting were approved as submitted. Dallam then began a discussion on the status of the current TH 12 alternatives (layouts) and requested that each community submit, from the perspective of the communiw, the "best" location of each alternative by December 3rd to HNTB. He said this would include alignment shifts, as appropriate or desired, to avoid important features that may not have been detected when the layouts were prepared. Dallam also requested each community to illustrate on the same (1" » 2,000 ’) map the location of the "special features" that should be avoided. To accomplish these tasks, Dallam said that it would be necessary and important for each community to organize their delegates so that one set of changes is received per community. Dallam also discu^d the status of the overlay mapping. Overlays showing wetlands, parks, cemeteries, schools, sites on the National Register of Historic Places, and residential areas are currently being prepared. The overlay of special features, including lands designated in Agricultural Preserves, "Big Woods" tree communities, sites of potential historic fignif*can<^, and other special features (as deemed appropriate by each community) will also be prepared. Responding to J.D. Goetten ’s question, Dallam said that overlays will be completed shortly after all data is received - including the special features that the individual communities provide. Dallam then distributed full-size maps (1" - 2,000 ’) to the technical committee attendees for each community to provide requested feedback. J. Dillman commented that the CR 11/TH S3 bypass option should be removed from fiirther study - that a freeway could not be accommodated, nor would traffic problems be solved. Dallam reiterated that if an alternative does not satisfy the transportation need, it will be inunediately dropped. (Trafric forecasts will provide the critical data to make this assessment). TrafBc forecasts for the project were then discussed. The Committee, Dallam, and Hay discussed the components of the Metro Council ’s 20 year forecast period, modeling process, and the effect they will have in the project area. 'AA 4k .i