Laserfiche WebLink
;! <br />1' <br />T.H. 12 CORRIDOR STUDY <br />Policy Committee Minutes <br />Maple Plain City Hall <br />October 24, 1990 <br />(Amended and Approved December 19. 1990) <br />Members Present: T. Humbert, G, Welter. M. Johnson, R. Bauman, M. Alger. J. Grabek, <br />G. Acromite, A, Kunze <br />Alternates Present: K. Gabriel, G. Cook, A. Vande Vegte <br />Others Present! S. Hay, L Dallam, R. Harris. J. Knuison. J. Johnson. D. Lorsung, <br />R. Peterson, R. Scheuer, B, Collins, P. Zanetti, K. .Madson, .A. Carlson. E. Peterson, <br />G. Cook, C. Rowlette, P. Pittel, S. Pittel <br />Hay called the meeting to order shortly after 5:30 p.m. The meeting agenda and the <br />minutes of September 26, 1990 Policj’ Committee meeting were approved. Hay <br />recommended that M. Johnson serve as Chair for the Polic>' Committee. This was acted <br />upon and approved by committee members. <br />Chair Johnson then asked for an update on the activities of the Technical and Citizen’s <br />Committees. Dallam explained that representatives from Hennepin and Wright Counties <br />were added to the Technical Committee. Chair Johnson asked that minutes from the <br />Technical and Citizen Committees be forwarded to Policy Committee representatives > both <br />draft and approved. Wetter added that this is preferable, and that it would become the <br />Policy Committee representative’s responsibility to forward them to their respective City <br />Offices. Dallam distributed current member rosters for each of the corridor study <br />committees. Kunze said that Arlo Vande Vegte should be listed as alternate for the Policy <br />Committee. <br />A discussion followed on the sequence of meetings and the speed of information <br />dissemination, in particular the availability of project mapping of the potential alternatives. <br />Dallam explained that no copies of the mapped alternatives had yet been made available <br />because of the need for the Policy Committee to first meet, hear the presentation, and offer <br />comments on the suggested alternatives. The concern was that information is given to the <br />Technical and Citizens Committee over a week before it is given to the Policy Committee, <br />and Policy Committee members are asked to respond to things they are unaware of. The <br />Committee discussed changing the meeting date and getting copies of the other committees’ <br />inifuitg*- It was agreed that the draft minutes would he sent as soon as possible after the <br />meetii^ Dallam said the committee meeting dates were established to have the Policy <br />Committee meet last because the other committees "report" to the Policy Committee. <br />Dallam and Hay said they would discuss ways of resolving the problem. <br />1