My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
01-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2024 2:28:36 PM
Creation date
5/13/2024 2:26:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 14, 1991 <br />LMCD SHORELAND REGULATIONS CONTINUED <br />CounciLmember Jabbour said, "Evon though we are oie of the <br />eight cities, I believa Orono is approachiig this fr.">m an <br />entirely different aspect. As Mark .’mentioned before. our <br />alliance with the other cities is likely to fall apart because of <br />our differences. Spring Park would probably like to see a more <br />liberal approaoh taken with regard to lake conservation. Orono <br />more censervative and wouxd li«*ie —^ ^ee mo..e reSw..iCwiie <br />regulations. I do not believe it is necessary to have another <br />body of government with levying authority to monitor what we have <br />been doing here for some rime. However, at the same time, it may <br />be necessary to have such an agency monitoring other cities which <br />have not been as conscientious about protecting Lake Minnetonka. <br />Callahan agreed with Jabbour's comments <br />Jabbour said, ” I am also concerned about specific language <br />in the Statutes which require us to obtain approval from the <br />adjacent municipality if we divert from the boiler-plate <br />language. I .vould like to have a legal opinion of that. I .vouid <br />not want the LMCD to become involvad with trying to resolve <br />differences between ourselves and our neighboring cities. <br />Callahan said, 'I agree, we wou d rivit want the LMCD <br />performing that kind of function. In listening to this <br />discussion, I recollected something that was said by the Mayor of <br />Tonka Bay. He stated that all of the lake communities have been <br />trying to do a good job of taking care of the lake. The rules <br />and regulations that each city established for taking care of the <br />lake are embodied in the Comprehensive Plans for each city. Each <br />city was required to submit their Comprehensive Plans to the Met <br />Council for approval. It is quite possible that it will be <br />necessary to amend those Plans in order to adopt what the DNR <br />wants. I believe we should try to get some protection from the <br />Metropolitan Council since they approved all of these <br />Comprehensive Plans. It may also be helpful in addressing the <br />concerns expressed by Councilmember Jabbour." <br />Jabbour said, "It is my understanding that before the LMCD <br />Plan can be adopted it is necessary for Gen Olson and Sneve Smit.h <br />to introduce legislation giving the LMCD the ability to levy <br />against properties. Gan Olson has indicated that she does not <br />support that, but I've not heard Mr. Smith's opinion." <br />Callahan stated that he would be willing to attend a meeting <br />with LMCD representatives if such a meeting is scheduled. <br />Jabbour stated that he too would attend the meeting. <br />Mayor Peterson asked whether JoEllen Hurr would be asked to <br />attend the meeting. <br />- 8 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.